re: #393 Bagua

Not from me, I welcome their raising their game and developing a Temp-set that is peer reviewable, open, robust, repeatable and able to be replicated and confirmed by indispensable researchers. With data sets that are documented, verifiable and accurate. The polar opposite of what the CRU produced.

What’s gonna happen when they get done and it looks basically the same? Do we relax, or do we seize upon any slightest deviance from the initial results, and become hysterical demanding a third round?