re: #394 cosmo

My take, albeit somewhat “loony” to some, is this: if you’ve been caught in the act of violating the law—in this case the attempted murder of 300+ individuals in the air, as well as others on the ground—perhaps a small suspension in your “rights” isn’t out of line, nor to this individual, unexpected.

I don’t consider, in this specific case, the withholding of “Bag Balm” to be “morally repugnant” as was suggested by SixDegrees. I do, however, consider attempting to murder 300+ innocents to be incredibly “morally repugnant.”

Those ‘rights’ in quotes? Would those be the ‘rights’ determined from the ‘Constitution’ of the ‘United States’, by the ‘Supreme Court’? Those ‘rights’? No, we don’t ignore or suspend those ‘rights’.