re: #36 Targetpractice

My guess, or rather my hope, is this is the hospital hoping to set judicial precedent that when the hospital rules that a fetus is not viable, then they’re not legally required to continue “life-saving care.”

Not so sure about that. She was dead from the start. Not like she was just in a coma.
Life saving care in this case, is a canard. Even some legislators said the law was not intended for this scenario and the hospital is misrepresenting the law.