re: #467 WindUpBird

Ah, another enemy of art. Another cultureless nitwit smearing an incredibly important artist for his choice of subject matter.

Methinks the same vacant, vacuous nimrods who wanted to slam the Obamas for their choice of art before are going to come out of the woodwork once again.

I don’t pontificate on how airplane engines work or the intricacies of World War I. Because I wouldn’t know what I was talking about. Just like you don’t know what you’re talking about now.

Art does not exist in a void. If it did, would it still be art? I don’t care what the White House puts on it’s ornaments, I don’t care what Warhol painted, but art elicits response, good art elicits strong response.

That response can’t be right or wrong. If there was a right or wrong way to respond to art, than it would be instruction, not art.

You may not agree with Lawhark, but he is not an enemy of art.