re: #471 Walter L. Newton

Well, that was a grand non-answer to my question. And not even clever. You are the one that presented the situation of the diplomats bending each others ear, and I countered, and you have nothing to back up your original supposition? You see Avanti, even when I do try to converse with you in some metered and calm way, you avoid the debate, much the same as you do if someone is yelling at you, arguing with you, rationalizing with you or simply pointing something out to you.

You run away no matter what, using claims that the person who is debating you is being this way or that. For you, a debate is anything you want to talk about, and argument is anything you don’t want to talk about, and you call the shots.

Lame.

You asked me a unanswerable question. How would I know what the topic of any discussion will be at a party that won’t happen until the 4th ? I could speculate, but I’m neither a diplomat or in the government, so all I can say is there is potential for discussion, but no data on what will be said.