re: #528 RogueOne

That’s the perspective. An 80% increase sounds massive until you take into account the losses during the last few years.

It’s kind of moot, though, isn’t it?

Can I then assume you’re not supportive of the tax code revisions (“closing loopholes and broadening the tax base”) the presidents debt commission suggested? The idea that we can selectively raise taxes rates and bring in more than 20% of GDP goes against 60 years of history.

I’m sorry, what are you talking about? Of course I’m in favor of closing loopholes.

What does your statement here have to do with what I said, in any way?