re: #532 Obdicut

I’m not going to engage with your speculation based on limited information. I have zero desire to do it. I’m not sure why you do. Can you explain?

Because having only limited information it seems to be an established fact already that Assange is a “rapist”.

The problem I see here that if the Swedish definition of rape or sexual coercion holds, accusing a man of “rape” becomes a weapon.

And then Assanges lawyers have not received a single official document until November 18, 2010 (and then in Swedish language contrary to European Law) and had to learn about the status of investigations through prosecution media announcements.

Strange ideed