re: #564 SanFranciscoZionist

1. ‘Two person consent laws’ apply to secretly and illegally taping a conversation?

Yes.
So removing the audio, and doing commentary over the video removes that issue, but makes the video “manipulated and edited”.

If the person being recorded would consent to the recording, the tape can be released.

2. ‘Edited for time’? This is their big scoop showing that ACORN helps pimps import little girls from Latin America and they had to ‘edit for time’.

They are in the interview with the acorn employees for an hour or more. No one will play the hour long video on the air. So they edit out the irrelevant stuff.

3. We don’t have the full raw tapes, because they won’t release them. Period. Why won’t they allow a third party to examine their ‘evidence’?

FALSE. We don’t have the full raw tapes because of the Two person consent laws. If the ACORN employee would consent, they would release the full tapes.