re: #650 Aceofwhat?

dude. i think the CRU affair was horrible for the reputation of AGW. but i read almost 40 pages of the transcripts last night (in between attempts to be gentle with Idioma) and it seems excessively clear that the output, however miraculously, is solid…for the last time.

read the whole proceeding.

There’s nothing “miraculous” or surprising about the fact that the data is solid. It always was solid. It was already checked, verified, and corroborated with other sources, because that’s what scientists do.

But of course, the silly dishonest claims of the denial industry won’t stop.