re: #910 LifeTrek

How do you equate leaving factually challenged or derogatory comments as intellectual honesty? Do you have some personal insight into or evidence of scientifically credible disagreements being deleted?

Going back more than 20 years only makes the warming case stronger. Doubt it? Look at the journals.

“Picking on where people work” has relevance if much of the opposing viewpoint is funded by shills for specific industry with a denialist agenda.

But it sounds to me like your mind was made up before watching. So I’m not optimistic.