1 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:31:51pm

This is going to cost the Republicans. There are just too many soundbites and statements to include in various political ads. The oil is still spilling and this could cost them dearly.

2 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:37:39pm

re: #1 Killgore Trout

This is going to cost the Republicans. There are just too many soundbites and statements to include in various political ads. The oil is still spilling and this could cost them dearly.

All they have to do is run an ad juxtaposing the drill baby drill cheers against pictures of the devastation in the gulf…

3 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:38:21pm

re: #1 Killgore Trout

This is going to cost the Republicans. There are just too many soundbites and statements to include in various political ads. The oil is still spilling and this could cost them dearly.

yeah it could… well of course they would have to be in a position of power to take the blame, but let me not harsh your mellow.

4 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:40:08pm

re: #2 PT Barnum

All they have to do is run an ad juxtaposing the drill baby drill cheers against pictures of the devastation in the gulf…

Yup. I’m wondering if this isn’t already playing into the Rubio/Crist poll results.

5 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:42:15pm

re: #4 freetoken

Yup. I’m wondering if this isn’t already playing into the Rubio/Crist poll results.

well maybe cause people are actually paying attention to more than sound bites? well that is just my theory…

6 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:43:10pm

“H.M.S. Douche”

/ROFL

7 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:43:18pm

re: #4 freetoken

Yup. I’m wondering if this isn’t already playing into the Rubio/Crist poll results.

Maybe, but more likely Dems are defecting to Crist from Meeks.

8 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:44:03pm

re: #5 brookly red

well maybe cause people are actually paying attention to more than sound bites? well that is just my theory…

That would be good, but since a lot of Rubio’s support seems to come from people incapable of understanding more complicated than soundbites, it’s probably more a matter of the independents not wanting any guanomaniacs in power.

9 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:44:29pm

In related news:


CalPERS loses big on BP stock

Since April 20, the 58 million BP shares owned by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System have plunged in value by $285 million, dropping from $586 million to $301 million, according to an analysis by Bloomberg News.

BP-related losses for all U.S. pension funds have totaled $1.4 billion as the value of BP stock tumbled 47%, Bloomberg data show.

As I said early on in this crisis, in the end we all will pay for it.

10 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:46:48pm

re: #8 PT Barnum

That would be good, but since a lot of Rubio’s support seems to come from people incapable of understanding more complicated than soundbites, it’s probably more a matter of the independents not wanting any guanomaniacs in power.

well yes of course all of these stupid people and their damned opinions… and worse than that they actually vote! There oughta be a law…

11 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:46:55pm

re: #9 freetoken

There are no winners in this thing. Besides the lawyers.

12 Four More Tears  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:47:00pm

re: #9 freetoken

In related news:

CalPERS loses big on BP stock

As I said early on in this crisis, in the end we all will pay for it.

Obama’s fault.

/

13 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:48:07pm

re: #9 freetoken

In related news:

CalPERS loses big on BP stock

As I said early on in this crisis, in the end we all will pay for it.

Fixed benefit pensions and this. Ohhh Boy.

14 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:48:59pm

“The oil is under a mile of water and 2.4 miles of solid sedimentary earth. I’d say that God has done enough to prevent these kinds of oil spills.”

15 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:49:40pm

re: #9 freetoken

In related news:

CalPERS loses big on BP stock

As I said early on in this crisis, in the end we all will pay for it.

As I’ve mentioned before, British pensioners are particularly had hit as about $1 in $6 of their income came from BP dividends, which of course also means they owned the stock and take another big hit is share price.

The losses to investors, both UK and US are above $150 billion so far.

16 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:49:53pm

re: #13 Rightwingconspirator

Fixed benefit pensions and this. Ohhh Boy.

oh did we say fixed… no we meant fixed sorry about that now please move on, next!

17 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:52:38pm

re: #15 Bagua

As I’ve mentioned before, British pensioners are particularly had hit as about $1 in $6 of their income came from BP dividends, which of course also means they owned the stock and take another big hit is share price.

The losses to investors, both UK and US are above $150 billion so far.

well shit… that free healthcare stuff is gonna come in mighty handy!

18 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:53:03pm

re: #15 Bagua

As I’ve mentioned before, British pensioners are particularly had hit as about $1 in $6 of their income came from BP dividends, which of course also means they owned the stock and take another big hit is share price.

The losses to investors, both UK and US are above $150 billion so far.

The Brits are really taking it in the shorts financially. Obama didn’t help things, and unnecessarily personalized it, by referring to BP as “British Petroleum”.

Seemed to add insult to injury.

19 jamesfirecat  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:53:42pm

re: #18 Nekama

The Brits are really taking it in the shorts financially. Obama didn’t help things, and unnecessarily personalized it, by referring to BP as “British Petroleum”.

Seemed to add insult to injury.

What does the BP actually stand for these days?

20 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:54:24pm

re: #19 jamesfirecat

What does the BP actually stand for these days?

a source of cash.

21 ~Fianna  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:55:04pm

re: #19 jamesfirecat

What does the BP actually stand for these days?

They were marketing it as “Beyond Petroleum”, but the official name of the company is just BP. the “beyond petroleum” bit was just greenwashing.

22 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:55:12pm

re: #19 jamesfirecat

What does the BP actually stand for these days?

“Beyond Petroleum”.

A reference to their exploration of other energy sources, I believe.

23 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:56:49pm

re: #10 brookly red

well yes of course all of these stupid people and their damned opinions… and worse than that they actually vote! There oughta be a law…

I’m in favor of requiring people to take a quiz on the positions of the candidates before being allowed to vote, but then I’m an elitist.

Of course that would be bad for the Fox News watchers too, since they’ve been shown to have the some of the poorest understanding of current events of any group of media consumers.

24 avanti  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:56:58pm

re: #7 Dark_Falcon

Maybe, but more likely Dems are defecting to Crist from Meeks.

Crist is making points by seeming to be in charge with the spill, lots of great photo opts for the sitting governor.

25 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:57:11pm

Wasn’t Haley Barbour a character on Hee Haw?

26 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:58:02pm

re: #18 Nekama

The Brits are really taking it in the shorts financially. Obama didn’t help things, and unnecessarily personalized it, by referring to BP as “British Petroleum”.

Seemed to add insult to injury.

Jesus I hope you’re not going to insist that Obama apologize for hurting their feelings.

27 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:58:48pm

re: #7 Dark_Falcon

Maybe, but more likely Dems are defecting to Crist from Meeks.

Meeks has no chance so they’d naturally prefer Crist to Rubio.

28 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:59:00pm

re: #25 Nekama

Wasn’t Haley Barbour a character on Hee Haw?

No, but he used to head the RNC. He’s smart and savvy.

29 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:59:15pm

OK, so I read the entire Rolling Stone article on McChrystal. I did not see any damning quotes attributed to him directly. Some of his aides were a little blunt in their criticism of Biden and others.

What did I miss?

30 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:59:24pm

re: #23 PT Barnum

I’m in favor of requiring people to take a quiz on the positions of the candidates before being allowed to vote, but then I’m an elitist.

why yes you are… thank you for copping the plea I didn’t want to get all messed up by putting that handle on you.

31 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 7:59:57pm

re: #28 Dark_Falcon

He sure doesn’t sound that way.

32 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:00:09pm

re: #27 Nekama

Meeks has no chance so they’d naturally prefer Crist to Rubio.

True that.

33 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:00:34pm

re: #30 brookly red

I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing, actually. I think people who don’t have a fucking clue should be kept as far away from the reins of power as possible.

34 kreyagg  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:01:02pm

Everything about this whole disaster seems to crush any amount of optimism I have.

Has anyone done anything to make to make any part of this problem better? Even the $20B escrow fund issue prompted me to think “Sounds a little low.”

As far as investors’ losses in BP goes this Clerks clip seems apt.

35 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:02:12pm

re: #33 PT Barnum

I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing, actually. I think people who don’t have a fucking clue should be kept as far away from the reins of power as possible.

and of course it is you who gets to decide those people are… yeah we have been down this road before.

36 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:02:55pm

re: #29 Racer X

He was quite uncomplimentary about his first meeting with BHO, and certainly surrounding himself with aides who are so indiscreet (“Biden? Bite me”) doesn’t reflect well on him.

37 avanti  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:03:05pm

re: #34 kreyagg

Everything about this whole disaster seems to crush any amount of optimism I have.

Has anyone done anything to make to make any part of this problem better? Even the $20B escrow fund issue prompted me to think “Sounds a little low.”

As far as investors’ losses in BP goes this Clerks clip seems apt.


[Video]

The 20 billion is not capped, there could be more coming.

38 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:03:06pm

re: #29 Racer X

Maybe something like this….

Even though he had voted for Obama, McChrystal and his new commander in chief failed from the outset to connect. The general first encountered Obama a week after he took office, when the president met with a dozen senior military officials in a room at the Pentagon known as the Tank. According to sources familiar with the meeting, McChrystal thought Obama looked “uncomfortable and intimidated” by the roomful of military brass. Their first one-on-one meeting took place in the Oval Office four months later, after McChrystal got the Afghanistan job, and it didn’t go much better. “It was a 10-minute photo op,” says an adviser to McChrystal. “Obama clearly didn’t know anything about him, who he was. Here’s the guy who’s going to run his fucking war, but he didn’t seem very engaged. The Boss was pretty disappointed.”
39 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:03:21pm

re: #29 Racer X

OK, so I read the entire Rolling Stone article on McChrystal. I did not see any damning quotes attributed to him directly. Some of his aides were a little blunt in their criticism of Biden and others.

What did I miss?

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?

40 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:04:19pm

re: #38 Killgore Trout

Maybe something like this…

That is a quote attributed to someone else. Those are not McChrystal’s words.

41 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:04:26pm

re: #39 Racer X

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?

get used to it… that is the way that these things go.

42 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:05:47pm

re: #39 Racer X

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?

It’s one thing to dislike and/or disrespect your boss. It’s another thing to say so in public.

The bad guys have CNN too (some would say they are CNN). He should have kept that shit to himself for his troops sake.

43 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:05:50pm

re: #35 brookly red

and of course it is you who gets to decide those people are… yeah we have been down this road before.

Don’t put words in my mouth.

But I don’t understand why basic civil competence is considered to be a downside.

People who can’t show they even have a dim awareness of the issues are a danger to us all, as they are the most easily manipulated.

If you want to venerate the incompetent, that’s fine, but I personally would like Idiotocracy to remain a movie, and not a documentary.

44 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:06:18pm

re: #38 Killgore Trout

So an advisor to McChrystal says “the boss was pretty disappointed”.

Thats it?

Court martial the guy for that? Seriously?

45 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:06:57pm

re: #39 Racer X

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?

He’s not going to be court martialed, but he is likely gone behind this. Even David Hunt on O’Reilly made it clear he has to go for this.

46 Four More Tears  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:07:19pm

re: #44 Racer X

Didn’t you say it was CNN talking about Court Martial? I should hope none of that’s being seriously discussed.

47 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:07:32pm

re: #42 Nekama

It’s one thing to dislike and/or disrespect your boss. It’s another thing to say so in public.

The bad guys have CNN too (some would say they are CNN). He should have kept that shit to himself for his troops sake.

He is a very blunt guy, but I have yet to see a direct quote attributed to him that warrants all of the criticism. Perhaps I missed it.

48 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:08:10pm

re: #44 Racer X

So an advisor to McChrystal says “the boss was pretty disappointed”.

Thats it?

Court martial the guy for that? Seriously?

Maybe he’s a seekrit Obama lover and his own staff if lying about him. . Would that make you feel better?

49 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:08:59pm

re: #39 Racer X

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?

It is a sin against nature to criticise Obama, haven’t your noticed?

50 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:09:02pm

re: #42 Nekama

It’s one thing to dislike and/or disrespect your boss. It’s another thing to say so in public.

The bad guys have CNN too (some would say they are CNN). He should have kept that shit to himself for his troops sake.

Personally, I think that part of the problem, that the military has become so cowed that they don’t have the balls anymore to stand up and tell the bean-counters and drama queens in D.C. to shut up and let them do their jobs. We don’t have generals anymore, we have politicians in uniform, who are hamstrung by career politicians who worry more about how things play with media than they do about whether they’re effective at winning wars.

51 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:09:29pm

re: #34 kreyagg

Everything about this whole disaster seems to crush any amount of optimism I have.

Has anyone done anything to make to make any part of this problem better?

What’s really disappointing to me is the lost opportunity (wasted crisis) to announce and get behind a quantum leap forward in renewable and nuclear energy.

52 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:09:29pm

re: #43 PT Barnum

Don’t put words in my mouth.

But I don’t understand why basic civil competence is considered to be a downside.

People who can’t show they even have a dim awareness of the issues are a danger to us all, as they are the most easily manipulated.

If you want to venerate the incompetent, that’s fine, but I personally would like Idiotocracy to remain a movie, and not a documentary.

well that blade cuts both ways, I would agree with you that if that was the case we would not have the leadership we now do. You see it all gets to be about who decides competency/awareness… and quite frankly I don’t trust you to do so. Sorry.

53 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:09:37pm

re: #46 JasonA

Didn’t you say it was CNN talking about Court Martial? I should hope none of that’s being seriously discussed.

I looked through the beginning of the earlier thread and thought ‘oh shit what the hell did this guy say?’ The comments were brutal.

54 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:09:50pm

There will be no court martial. That is just stupid. Who the heck says that will happen?

55 Mad Prophet Ludwig  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:10:09pm

re: #51 Nekama

What’s really disappointing to me is the lost opportunity (wasted crisis) to announce and get behind a quantum leap forward in renewable and nuclear energy.

I love you.

56 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:11:03pm

re: #48 Killgore Trout

Maybe he’s a seekrit Obama lover and his own staff if lying about him. . Would that make you feel better?

Ha!

No. I like facts. I try to cut to the chase. It seems to me feelings were taking over on this one. Everyone thought for sure The general made some disparaging remarks. I did not see them.

57 Renaissance_Man  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:11:26pm

Just yesterday I was in a supermarket picking up a few things, and after hearing me ask for a half pound of ham slices, the deli lady launched into an incoherent rant about them British people and how she’d love to throw all of them in prison - all of them apparently, the whole country. Because they’d been criminally negligent, and killed 11 of our people, and because some other British people (or maybe the same British people who killed some guys to spill some oil, hard to tell) had once been rude to her in some other customer service job. It was quite something to watch, the sort of rant you normally only get from mad tramps at lonely train stations in the middle of the night.

It’s nothing unique to Americans that any major issue can be quickly boiled down to ‘our boys’ and ‘them foreigners with their funny ways’, especially if them foreigners can be accused of some monolithic evil. Nor is it unique to Americans to want to express this nativism in peculiar ways, such as Freedom Fries. Both of these are part of the character of humans all over the world. However, what is unique to Americans is the charming way they have of ranting about them other folk, while clearly including you in that class of other folk, yet somehow also not including you, and being just as polite and pleasant as can be, as if simply by the very virtue of standing in front of them that makes you one of us, and thus part of the club, and obviously just as outraged about them other folk as they are. I thought Borat was an execrable pile of trash, but it did show Americans in a truly positive light - even when they have no understanding of anything outside their daily lives, and even when the foreigners are being truly appalling, they are always unfailingly polite and pleasant. And I find that rare and charming.

Once she was done, a good ten minutes later, I resisted the urge to applaud, and explained that my accent was not in fact British. And then I asked again about the ham.

58 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:12:05pm

re: #55 LudwigVanQuixote

I love you.

Get a room.

59 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:12:55pm

re: #57 Renaissance_Man

Just yesterday I was in a supermarket picking up a few things, and after hearing me ask for a half pound of ham slices, the deli lady launched into an incoherent rant about them British people and how she’d love to throw all of them in prison - all of them apparently, the whole country. Because they’d been criminally negligent, and killed 11 of our people, and because some other British people (or maybe the same British people who killed some guys to spill some oil, hard to tell) had once been rude to her in some other customer service job. It was quite something to watch, the sort of rant you normally only get from mad tramps at lonely train stations in the middle of the night.

It’s nothing unique to Americans that any major issue can be quickly boiled down to ‘our boys’ and ‘them foreigners with their funny ways’, especially if them foreigners can be accused of some monolithic evil. Nor is it unique to Americans to want to express this nativism in peculiar ways, such as Freedom Fries. Both of these are part of the character of humans all over the world. However, what is unique to Americans is the charming way they have of ranting about them other folk, while clearly including you in that class of other folk, yet somehow also not including you, and being just as polite and pleasant as can be, as if simply by the very virtue of standing in front of them that makes you one of us, and thus part of the club, and obviously just as outraged about them other folk as they are. I thought Borat was an execrable pile of trash, but it did show Americans in a truly positive light - even when they have no understanding of anything outside their daily lives, and even when the foreigners are being truly appalling, they are always unfailingly polite and pleasant. And I find that rare and charming.

Once she was done, a good ten minutes later, I resisted the urge to applaud, and explained that my accent was not in fact British. And then I asked again about the ham.

there is a reason ham is considered un clean :)

60 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:13:33pm

re: #52 brookly red

well that blade cuts both ways, I would agree with you that if that was the case we would not have the leadership we now do. You see it all gets to be about who decides competency/awareness… and quite frankly I don’t trust you to do so. Sorry.

So what would you select as the criteria? I would expect people to be able to identify the candidates, their positions (the major ones) and their proposals.

Somehow I think “the other guy’s a sekrit Muslim and a soshulist” isn’t really much of a proposal but that’s just me.

61 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:13:43pm

re: #50 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Personally, I think that part of the problem, that the military has become so cowed that they don’t have the balls anymore to stand up and tell the bean-counters and drama queens in D.C. to shut up and let them do their jobs. We don’t have generals anymore, we have politicians in uniform, who are hamstrung by career politicians who worry more about how things play with media than they do about whether they’re effective at winning wars.

Very true. I can’t believe there wasn’t a mass mutiny over the pussified ROE. And that shit’s been going down since Bush turned our great warriors into “peace keepers” who were supposed to win “hearts and minds”.

These people kill people and blow things up. THAT’S their job. If the pols don’t have the stomach for the nasty stuff then they shouldn’t send our fine young people into battle.

62 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:14:14pm

re: #55 LudwigVanQuixote

I love you.

Thanks Mom!

63 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:15:15pm

re: #49 Bagua

It is a sin against nature to criticise Obama, haven’t your noticed?

The really funny part?

McChrystal has been adopting some of Biden’s strategies in Afghanistan. The troops there do not like it. It looks to me like he has been trying real hard to follow directions from Obama and his administration and those around him are not happy about it.

He is doing what a soldier should do - follow the directions of the politicians. He is getting crucified for something he did not do. Again, unless I missed a direct quote of his.

64 Tigger2005  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:15:29pm

re: #51 Nekama

What’s really disappointing to me is the lost opportunity (wasted crisis) to announce and get behind a quantum leap forward in renewable and nuclear energy.

Why is it a “lost” opportunity? Seems like the opportunity is still there and will be for a long time. People have not really even begun to feel the full effect of this disaster. When they do, maybe they’ll be ready for some real change.

65 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:16:32pm

re: #61 Nekama

Very true. I can’t believe there wasn’t a mass mutiny over the pussified ROE. And that shit’s been going down since Bush turned our great warriors into “peace keepers” who were supposed to win “hearts and minds”.

These people kill people and blow things up. THAT’S their job. If the pols don’t have the stomach for the nasty stuff then they shouldn’t send our fine young people into battle.

That would require that the politicians actually give some thought to diplomacy and trying to win hearts and minds first (which takes a hell of a lot longer) instead of just blowing things up (which is fairly immediate)

66 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:16:35pm

re: #57 Renaissance_Man

Good post, very insightful.

67 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:18:43pm

re: #64 Tigger2005

Why is it a “lost” opportunity? Seems like the opportunity is still there and will be for a long time. People have not really even begun to feel the full effect of this disaster. When they do, maybe they’ll be ready for some real change.

Yes, you’re right. I really had BHO’s speech in mind but didn’t say so. My bad.

Renewables and nuclear. Something for everybody.

I’m just amazed that someone with such great political instincts - as good if not better than Clinton - who’s got Emmanuel telling him not to waste a crisis - let that one get away.

But you’re right. There’s still time.

68 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:18:43pm

re: #60 PT Barnum

So what would you select as the criteria? I would expect people to be able to identify the candidates, their positions (the major ones) and their proposals.

Somehow I think “the other guy’s a sekrit Muslim and a soshulist” isn’t really much of a proposal but that’s just me.

I would not select a criteria that is the point… one citizen one vote. Unless you happen to be a selected group that gets to vote 6 times.

greenwichtime.com


but this is not an outrage…

69 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:18:48pm

re: #64 Tigger2005

Why is it a “lost” opportunity? Seems like the opportunity is still there and will be for a long time. People have not really even begun to feel the full effect of this disaster. When they do, maybe they’ll be ready for some real change.

That opportunity has been lost by a lot of the previous presidents because not one has been willing to do the one thing that would create an incentive for people to drive less and travel more efficiently: Raise the gas tax to pay for the transition from petroleum to other forms of energy. As long as gas is relatively cheap, you are going to have a hard time getting people to adopt new habits and technologies.

70 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:19:15pm

re: #63 Racer X

Once thing about Obama, at least he’s cool. He’ll have a couple beers with McChrystal and chide him about his comments at a roast.

71 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:19:32pm

re: #19 jamesfirecat

What does the BP actually stand for these days?

Not British!

Good catch James!

72 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:20:12pm

So what is the consensus here if any?
Is he gone or is he assigned to finish what he started regardless, or else?

73 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:20:18pm

re: #68 brookly red

I would not select a criteria that is the point… one citizen one vote. Unless you happen to be a selected group that gets to vote 6 times.

[Link: www.greenwichtime.com…]

but this is not an outrage…

So you don’t see an uninformed electorate as an issue?

74 Cannadian Club Akbar  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:21:46pm

Evening Honcos.

75 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:22:11pm

re: #64 Tigger2005

Why is it a “lost” opportunity? Seems like the opportunity is still there and will be for a long time. People have not really even begun to feel the full effect of this disaster. When they do, maybe they’ll be ready for some real change.

Are people ready to slash their standard of living?

76 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:22:19pm

re: #69 PT Barnum

That opportunity has been lost by a lot of the previous presidents because not one has been willing to do the one thing that would create an incentive for people to drive less and travel more efficiently: Raise the gas tax to pay for the transition from petroleum to other forms of energy. As long as gas is relatively cheap, you are going to have a hard time getting people to adopt new habits and technologies.

yep, and as someone who wants a V8 monster, I heartily endorse a big gas tax to pay for the transition. Make daily drivers 80mpg, bring all those awesome city cars from europe over here, make bloated one-occupant 50000 lb daily driver SUVs nearly extinct, leave the big engines to car enthusiasts :D

77 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:22:45pm

re: #68 brookly red

I would not select a criteria that is the point… one citizen one vote. Unless you happen to be a selected group that gets to vote 6 times.

[Link: www.greenwichtime.com…]

but this is not an outrage…

yes that is right a court can order that some people can vote 6 times… I got a problem with that but hey I am just a wingnut. I am sure it is all good.

78 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:22:55pm

re: #69 PT Barnum

That opportunity has been lost by a lot of the previous presidents because not one has been willing to do the one thing that would create an incentive for people to drive less and travel more efficiently: Raise the gas tax to pay for the transition from petroleum to other forms of energy.

But we worship the automobile. We have developed special ceremonial ties to the things… Just off the wire:

Senate cuts to recession relief bill favor special interests

As the Senate scrambles to scale back a $140-billion recession relief bill, the poor, the elderly and the unemployed are bearing the brunt of the squeeze. But NASCAR track developers, movie producers and other special interests are likely to escape unscathed.

[…]

Proponents argue that their favored provisions contribute to job creation. A case in point is the NASCAR break, which affects how quickly motor sports entertainment complexes can write off the cost of property development. Track owners spread the cost of such investments over seven years; most taxpayers are allowed 15 years for business property depreciation.

The Internal Revenue Service challenged the seven-year schedule used by International Speedway Corp. — owners of the Daytona Speedway and 11 other NASCAR tracks — but in 2004 Congress passed a law reversing the IRS ruling.

Lenny Santiago, a spokesman for International Speedway, said the tax treatment helped the Daytona Speedway generate $1.9 billion a year in economic benefits to central Florida.

“We have to continue to make the facilities appealing to fans,” he said. “We can’t let things fall into disrepair.”

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) said at a recent hearing that it was an “unjustified and unnecessary” break, worth $38 million to the company, that would never pass muster as a straight-up appropriation of federal money.

“If you were to come … and ask us to write a check through the appropriations process for $38 million for the year only for NASCAR,” Doggett said, “you’d be laughed out of the room.”

79 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:23:28pm

re: #39 Racer X

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?

Holy shit.

He blew it by giving those quotes, and having those quotes confirmed 2 weeks ago by RS. He knew this was coming.

CIC unless it’s Obama. That’s all I’m hearing.

80 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:24:17pm

re: #79 Stanley Sea

Holy shit.

He blew it by giving those quotes, and having those quotes confirmed 2 weeks ago by RS. He knew this was coming.

CIC unless it’s Obama. That’s all I’m hearing.

RS sent him the final draft and he approved it. No changes were requested, or so I hear.

81 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:24:53pm

re: #65 PT Barnum

That would require that the politicians actually give some thought to diplomacy and trying to win hearts and minds first (which takes a hell of a lot longer) instead of just blowing things up (which is fairly immediate)

Very true. But war is serious stuff. It deserves thinking, and thinking some more, and playing all sorts of scenarios out. Bush blew it on Iraq, IMHO.

Crushing Saddam was the easy part. Now what do we do?

Wolfowitz and “the Iraqis will welcome us” and “the oil revenue will pay for it all” should be in Gitmo. He and Rumsfeld have killed more of our guys than the Iraqis ever could.

82 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:25:07pm

re: #73 PT Barnum

So you don’t see an uninformed electorate as an issue?

It is a huge issue! major big humongous issue! look at what ignorant people voting has gotten us into! unfortunately stupid is a right.

83 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:26:51pm

re: #78 freetoken

Convincing people to drive less or get off their reliance of cars will require far more effort than just making their cars smaller, lighter, more efficient, and petroleum free. If a guy can go on craigslist, buy a Metro, bolt on some stuff and get 100mpg in the thing, we can do this.

There’s no reason for single-occupant commuter 4500 lb cars. Its a ludicrous extravagance.

84 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:26:52pm

re: #78 freetoken

I think you bolded the wrong part.

Lenny Santiago, a spokesman for International Speedway, said the tax treatment helped the Daytona Speedway generate $1.9 billion a year in economic benefits to central Florida.

We spent $38 million and pumped almost $2 Billion into the economy. Isn’t that exactly how Stimulus is supposed to work?

Plus, it’s NASCAR Baby!

85 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:27:05pm

re: #82 brookly red

It is a huge issue! major big humongous issue! look at what ignorant people voting has gotten us into! unfortunately stupid is a right.

I would agree, although I think the number of low information voters were overly high on both sides in the last election.

86 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:27:11pm

re: #49 Bagua

It is a sin against nature to criticise Obama, haven’t your noticed?

Lame.

87 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:27:25pm

re: #79 Stanley Sea

Holy shit.

He blew it by giving those quotes, and having those quotes confirmed 2 weeks ago by RS. He knew this was coming.

CIC unless it’s Obama. That’s all I’m hearing.

Which quotes?

88 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:27:35pm

re: #68 brookly red

I would not select a criteria that is the point… one citizen one vote. Unless you happen to be a selected group that gets to vote 6 times.

[Link: www.greenwichtime.com…]

but this is not an outrage…

so bird, how do you justify 1 person being able to vote six times more than another person? Please I would love to hear the logic.

89 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:27:49pm

re: #61 Nekama

Very true. I can’t believe there wasn’t a mass mutiny over the pussified ROE. And that shit’s been going down since Bush turned our great warriors into “peace keepers” who were supposed to win “hearts and minds”.

These people kill people and blow things up. THAT’S their job. If the pols don’t have the stomach for the nasty stuff then they shouldn’t send our fine young people into battle.

America is simply no longer willing to fight to win. And much to Israel’s dismay, America will not allow Israel to fight to win either. It’s the new age of warfare…fighting to win a military victory is barbaric and forbidden.

90 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:28:21pm

re: #80 Rightwingconspirator

RS sent him the final draft and he approved it. No changes were requested, or so I hear.

I read the entire article. I did not find anything that was damning from McChrystal. What did I miss?

91 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:28:27pm

re: #79 Stanley Sea

Holy shit.

He blew it by giving those quotes, and having those quotes confirmed 2 weeks ago by RS. He knew this was coming.

CIC unless it’s Obama. That’s all I’m hearing.

Only a white republican president gets respect from the troops! Who does this kid in the oval office think he is?!?!

92 SteveC  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:29:07pm

re: #89 Spare O’Lake

America is simply no longer willing to fight to win. And much to Israel’s dismay, America will not allow Israel to fight to win either. It’s the new age of warfare…fighting to win a military victory is barbaric and forbidden.

Somebody had better rethink that real quick or the Old Age of Warfare is gonna kick our ass.

93 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:29:29pm

re: #50 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Personally, I think that part of the problem, that the military has become so cowed that they don’t have the balls anymore to stand up and tell the bean-counters and drama queens in D.C. to shut up and let them do their jobs. We don’t have generals anymore, we have politicians in uniform, who are hamstrung by career politicians who worry more about how things play with media than they do about whether they’re effective at winning wars.

Any four star general is a politician, period

94 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:29:40pm

re: #56 Racer X

Ha!

No. I like facts. I try to cut to the chase. It seems to me feelings were taking over on this one. Everyone thought for sure The general made some disparaging remarks. I did not see them.

Really? Because you seem to assume @#39 that the quotes are accurate and his crime is “Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?”
Are the quotes inaccurate or does he hate his commander? Which is it? You can’t simultaneously argue both at the same time.
I suspect you, and many others, will love him just because he trashed the President. I think that’s why he did it. It’s an easy ploy to launch a political career because he’s against Obama. He doesn’t need ideas of his own he only has to shout out “you lie” or whatever to garner Tea Party/Wingnut support. It’s very easy to do and anyone with a high profile could easily see themselves on the next Republican presidential ticket by using the same gimmick. You idiots are getting played.

95 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:29:48pm

re: #83 WindUpBird


There’s no reason for single-occupant commuter 4500 lb cars. Its a ludicrous extravagance.

What?! I thought is was the God-given right of his Chosen Nation (chosen at least until the Rapture at which time Israel returns to the fold.)

96 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:30:01pm

re: #91 WindUpBird

Only a white republican president gets respect from the troops! Who does this kid in the oval office think he is?!?!

Ahh. The race card. Well played.

97 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:30:27pm

re: #69 PT Barnum

That opportunity has been lost by a lot of the previous presidents because not one has been willing to do the one thing that would create an incentive for people to drive less and travel more efficiently: Raise the gas tax to pay for the transition from petroleum to other forms of energy. As long as gas is relatively cheap, you are going to have a hard time getting people to adopt new habits and technologies.

True, but raising taxes usually doesn’t get you elected. I would have been fine with a gradually increasing gas tax and a floor, below which gas prices could never fall, so that alternatives would know they wouldn’t get submarined by cheap gas and they could raise money.

Putting that tax money in a dedicated fund toward a Manhattan Project type initiative for renewables would have been great. And it’s exactly the type of thing that real leadership could have gotten our country behind.

Maybe it will happen soon. One can hope.

98 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:31:27pm

re: #94 Killgore Trout

Really? Because you seem to assume @#39 that the quotes are accurate and his crime is “Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?”
Are the quotes inaccurate or does he hate his commander? Which is it? You can’t simultaneously argue both at the same time.
I suspect you, and many others, will love him just because he trashed the President. I think that’s why he did it. It’s an easy ploy to launch a political career because he’s against Obama. He doesn’t need ideas of his own he only has to shout out “you lie” or whatever to garner Tea Party/Wingnut support. It’s very easy to do and anyone with a high profile could easily see themselves on the next Republican presidential ticket by using the same gimmick. You idiots are getting played.

People are easily manipulated by political stunts. Especially when they’re pissed off and afraid.

This is a stunt.

99 PT Barnum  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:32:01pm

re: #97 Nekama

True, but raising taxes usually doesn’t get you elected. I would have been fine with a gradually increasing gas tax and a floor, below which gas prices could never fall, so that alternatives would know they wouldn’t get submarined by cheap gas and they could raise money.

Putting that tax money in a dedicated fund toward a Manhattan Project type initiative for renewables would have been great. And it’s exactly the type of thing that real leadership could have gotten our country behind.

Maybe it will happen soon. One can hope.

I don’t love you as much as Ludwig, but I will respect you in the morning…:)

100 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:32:08pm

re: #94 Killgore Trout

Really? Because you seem to assume @#39 that the quotes are accurate and his crime is “Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?”
Are the quotes inaccurate or does he hate his commander? Which is it? You can’t simultaneously argue both at the same time.
I suspect you, and many others, will love him just because he trashed the President. I think that’s why he did it. It’s an easy ploy to launch a political career because he’s against Obama. He doesn’t need ideas of his own he only has to shout out “you lie” or whatever to garner Tea Party/Wingnut support. It’s very easy to do and anyone with a high profile could easily see themselves on the next Republican presidential ticket by using the same gimmick. You idiots are getting played.

Please post me a quote attributed to McChrystal. Not some aide, or what some aide thought McChrystal thinks. An actual quote.

That’s all I ask.

101 Reginald Perrin  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:32:13pm

re: #75 Spare O’Lake

Are people ready to slash their standard of living?

I’m not sure what part of Canada you’re from, but were I live, green energy is going to be creating a lot of jobs.

Samsung C&T, Korea Electric Power Company to Build World’s Largest Wind, Solar Panel Cluster in Ontario

$7 billion renewable energy project will be largest of its kind in the world

According to the terms of the green energy investment agreement, Samsung C&T and KEPCO will establish and operate a series of wind and solar power clusters over the next 20 years. The clusters, which will be built in several locations throughout the province, will eventually include wind turbines that will generate up to 2000 MW as well as solar power facilities that will generate up to 500 MW. The entire project will have a combined power-generating capacity of 2.5 GW by 2016, producing energy equivalent to four per cent of Ontario’s total electricity consumption.

The Province plans to shut down all of its coal-fired power plants by 2014 and increase Ontario’s ratio of renewable power generation. Ontario is currently a North American leader in the adoption of green energy policies with its passing of the Green Energy Act in May 2009.

102 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:32:17pm

re: #98 WindUpBird

People are easily manipulated by political stunts. Especially when they’re pissed off and afraid.

This is a stunt.

I’m pretty sure it is.

103 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:32:42pm

re: #98 WindUpBird

People are easily manipulated by political stunts. Especially when they’re pissed off and afraid.

This is a stunt.

Oh I wholeheartedly agree with you on this one.

104 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:33:01pm

re: #91 WindUpBird

Only a white republican president gets respect from the troops! Who does this kid in the oval office think he is?!?!

That particular “troop” (McChrystal) respected Obama enough to vote for him.

What happened after that to make McChrystal lose respect is anybody’s guess, really.

McChrystal was way out of line, making those comments. Way out line.

105 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:33:41pm

re: #89 Spare O’Lake

America is simply no longer willing to fight to win. And much to Israel’s dismay, America will not allow Israel to fight to win either. It’s the new age of warfare…fighting to win a military victory is barbaric and forbidden.

I don’t know. Neither of them has really been pushed hard enough yet. If it came down to survival - and Israel is getting close - there would be some serious ass kicked.

106 SteveC  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:33:45pm

re: #95 freetoken

What?! I thought is was the God-given right of his Chosen Nation (chosen at least until the Rapture at which time Israel returns to the fold.)

G-d drives a Plymouth, you know. The scripture says that He drove Adam and Eve from the garden of Eden in his Fury.

107 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:33:58pm

re: #86 Stanley Sea

Lame.

Hey, I try my best.

108 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:34:03pm

re: #95 freetoken

What?! I thought is was the God-given right of his Chosen Nation (chosen at least until the Rapture at which time Israel returns to the fold.)

Jesus himself. Himself! He came down on a sunbeam and he told me and my lovely wife that it’s very Christian and righteous to have two matching red, white and blue 6600 pound Hummer H2s and gigagallons of cheap crude to power them with!

109 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:34:13pm

re: #94 Killgore Trout

Really? Because you seem to assume @#39 that the quotes are accurate and his crime is “Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?”
Are the quotes inaccurate or does he hate his commander? Which is it? You can’t simultaneously argue both at the same time.
I suspect you, and many others, will love him just because he trashed the President. I think that’s why he did it. It’s an easy ploy to launch a political career because he’s against Obama. He doesn’t need ideas of his own he only has to shout out “you lie” or whatever to garner Tea Party/Wingnut support. It’s very easy to do and anyone with a high profile could easily see themselves on the next Republican presidential ticket by using the same gimmick. You idiots are getting played.

If Obama doesn’t accept his resignation tomorrow, then who exactly will be getting gamed then? And by whom?

110 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:34:13pm

re: #104 reine.de.tout

That particular “troop” (McChrystal) respected Obama enough to vote for him.

What happened after that to make McChrystal lose respect is anybody’s guess, really.

McChrystal was way out of line, making those comments. Way out line.

Which comments?

111 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:35:36pm

re: #88 brookly red

so bird, how do you justify 1 person being able to vote six times more than another person? Please I would love to hear the logic.

OK bird fill yer hand!

how in AMERICA is it OK for a judge to award a group 6 votes per person, you down dinged it now back it up.

112 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:35:52pm

re: #110 Racer X

Which comments?

McChrystal and his team, then. And this was his team, and he allowed them to spout off. Wrong.

113 SteveC  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:36:09pm

re: #108 WindUpBird

Jesus himself. Himself! He came down on a sunbeam and he told me and my lovely wife that it’s very Christian and righteous to have two matching red, white and blue 6600 pound Hummer H2s and gigagallons of cheap crude to power them with!

Jesus drove a Honda. He and the disciples were all in one Accord.

114 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:36:24pm

re: #99 PT Barnum

I was just planning on sleeping late.

115 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:36:42pm

re: #100 Racer X

I”l post you your quote….

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?


You feel his opinions are accurately portrayed in the article and he’s being persecuted for speaking out. That’s why you like him.

116 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:36:53pm

re: #110 Racer X

Which comments?

And check out Killgore’s #38.re: #38 Killgore Trout

117 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:37:16pm

re: #75 Spare O’Lake

Are people ready to slash their standard of living?

How exactly is becoming more efficient slashing your standard of living? Take cars for example: there are a lot of bloated SUVs that use a lot of gas. And there’s a lot of amazingly cool cars that get 40mpg. It’s not standard of living. it’s just waste.

118 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:38:05pm

re: #94 Killgore Trout

Really? Because you seem to assume @#39 that the quotes are accurate and his crime is “Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?”
Are the quotes inaccurate or does he hate his commander? Which is it? You can’t simultaneously argue both at the same time.
I suspect you, and many others, will love him just because he trashed the President. I think that’s why he did it. It’s an easy ploy to launch a political career because he’s against Obama. He doesn’t need ideas of his own he only has to shout out “you lie” or whatever to garner Tea Party/Wingnut support. It’s very easy to do and anyone with a high profile could easily see themselves on the next Republican presidential ticket by using the same gimmick. You idiots are getting played.

Thank you Killgore.

The people who have always been about “Country” are so quick to support insubordination. I’ve been whip lashing all day.

119 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:38:53pm

re: #118 Stanley Sea

Thank you Killgore.

The people who have always been about “Country” are so quick to support insubordination. I’ve been whip lashing all day.

eh.
Insubordination is not supported by this wingnut.
This was wrong.

120 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:39:13pm

re: #89 Spare O’Lake

America Obama is simply no longer willing to fight to win. And much to Israel’s dismay, America Obama will not allow Israel to fight to win either. It’s the new age of warfare…fighting to win a military victory is barbaric and forbidden.

Fixed

121 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:39:23pm

re: #111 brookly red

OK bird fill yer hand!

how in AMERICA is it OK for a judge to award a group 6 votes per person, you down dinged it now back it up.

You did not even read that article.

Seriously, you are so stupid you defeat the word stupid

122 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:39:28pm

re: #103 Racer X

Oh I wholeheartedly agree with you on this one.

USA USA USA!

Country First!

bullshit.

123 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:39:45pm

re: #117 WindUpBird

How exactly is becoming more efficient slashing your standard of living? Take cars for example: there are a lot of bloated SUVs that use a lot of gas. And there’s a lot of amazingly cool cars that get 40mpg. It’s not standard of living. it’s just waste.

as much of a waste as one person voting 6 times, legally? come on bird.

124 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:41:13pm

re: #115 Killgore Trout

I”l post you your quote


You feel his opinions are accurately portrayed in the article and he’s being persecuted for speaking out. That’s why you like him.

I love the man.

Wait, no I don’t. He voted for Obama.

;-)

125 Cannadian Club Akbar  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:41:21pm

For every 10 MPG of what you drive, you get 1 vote. I’m buying a scooter.
/

126 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:41:23pm

re: #118 Stanley Sea

I’m building a raft to navigate this river of dumb. Would you like to navigate? :D

127 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:41:32pm

re: #50 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Personally, I think that part of the problem, that the military has become so cowed that they don’t have the balls anymore to stand up and tell the bean-counters and drama queens in D.C. to shut up and let them do their jobs. We don’t have generals anymore, we have politicians in uniform, who are hamstrung by career politicians who worry more about how things play with media than they do about whether they’re effective at winning wars.

It would be naive in the extreme to assume it has not always been so. Generals are political figures, like it or not.

128 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:41:35pm

re: #116 reine.de.tout

And check out Killgore’s #38.re: #38 Killgore Trout

Saw it.

129 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:41:35pm

re: #109 Spare O’Lake

If Obama doesn’t accept his resignation tomorrow, then who exactly will be getting gamed then? And by whom?

I think Obama will not accept his resignation and keep hi tied up with some crappy job in an obscure and miserable post in Qxyrzstan while answering to bureaucrats who want things typed in triplicate on 1950’s manual typewriters using real carbon paper. It keeps him from being a Tea Party Hero for disgracing his country and increases his own personal misery.
If they feel he’s a real idiot who will self destruct on his own they might just let him go.

130 Eclectic Infidel  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:41:50pm

A day of prayer? Our country will be a better place when society moves away from the absurdity of superstition. And it is absurd.

131 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:42:13pm

re: #121 WindUpBird

You did not even read that article.

Seriously, you are so stupid you defeat the word stupid

oh I am stupid, my parents came here for the right to vote 1 time… yes when in doubt call someone stupid… can I be a racist puppy kicker too or are you just gonna duck.

132 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:42:31pm

re: #109 Spare O’Lake

If Obama doesn’t accept his resignation tomorrow, then who exactly will be getting gamed then? And by whom?

So you’re spinning if Obama keeps him on Obama will be “gamed” by a general?

Glad you are a Canadian, cause you are not on the side of the US.

133 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:42:48pm

re: #101 Reginald Perrin

That Samsung deal is just fine, but it represents only 4% and in 20 years that could be 2% assuming reasonable growth in demand. The loss of the coal-fired plants will likely produce a net decrease in generating capacity. So when all is said and done, this seems a lot like some more of McGuinty’s typical smoke and mirror Liberal lying bullshit.

134 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:43:29pm

Anything to hurt Obama.
Shit, how very much like the moonbats under Bush.

135 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:43:35pm

re: #115 Killgore Trout

I”l post you your quote


You feel his opinions are accurately portrayed in the article and he’s being persecuted for speaking out. That’s why you like him.

So transparent. McCrystal 1, Obama 0.

136 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:44:11pm

re: #113 SteveC

Jesus drove a Honda. He and the disciples were all in one Accord.

But not that V6 Hybrid accord, that one’s tuned more for HP than efficiency :D

137 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:44:28pm

re: #119 reine.de.tout

I know you! :)

138 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:44:30pm

Look, I could care less about McChrystal. I read the entire Rolling Stone article and I did not find one direct quote of the general that was horrible. None. What did I miss?

139 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:44:40pm

re: #121 WindUpBird

You did not even read that article.

Seriously, you are so stupid you defeat the word stupid

Is that really necessary?

140 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:44:44pm

re: #39 Racer X

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?

No, for talking out of school in Rolling Stone.

Now, CNN is being demented.

141 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:45:28pm

re: #49 Bagua

It is a sin against nature to criticise Obama, haven’t your noticed?

ReALity check.

142 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:45:33pm

re: #126 WindUpBird

I’m building a raft to navigate this river of dumb. Would you like to navigate? :D

My neck hurts, but I’ll try.

143 Nekama  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:45:36pm

Good night all.

144 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:46:21pm

re: #122 Stanley Sea

USA USA USA!

Country First!

bullshit.

Not sure what you mean?

145 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:46:25pm

re: #141 SanFranciscoZionist

ReALity check.

Heh, she’s catching up quickly.

146 garhighway  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:46:51pm

re: #77 brookly red

yes that is right a court can order that some people can vote 6 times… I got a problem with that but hey I am just a wingnut. I am sure it is all good.

Cumulative voting is evil?

That’s a new one.

147 Reginald Perrin  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:47:51pm

re: #133 Spare O’Lake

It’s not the only project, there are literally dozens of wind and solar projects being developed. In fact there are currently more green energy proposols in Ontario than the grid can handle.

Did you miss the part of my post where it said Ontario will close all coal fired plants by the year 2014?

148 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:47:58pm

Where did McChrystal “trash the president”?

Anyone? Bueller?

149 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:48:03pm

re: #77 brookly red

yes that is right a court can order that some people can vote 6 times… I got a problem with that but hey I am just a wingnut. I am sure it is all good.

It seems like a terrible idea.

Why you’re doing a little pity party for yourself over this story is another question.

150 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:49:09pm

re: #148 Racer X

Where did McChrystal “trash the president”?

Anyone? Bueller?

It’s a nontroversy.

151 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:49:30pm

re: #144 Racer X

Not sure what you mean?

LAKERS.

152 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:50:17pm

re: #149 SanFranciscoZionist

It seems like a terrible idea.

Why you’re doing a little pity party for yourself over this story is another question.

It was a terrible idea.
Which is why I personally don’t think it’ll catch on.

153 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:50:27pm

re: #90 Racer X
Yes the media is running away with the sensational. Shocka! Obviously he unleashed his aides candor. “Bite Me”=Biden? Attribute his aides actions & words to him directly.

It’s simply not done!

154 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:50:50pm

re: #102 Killgore Trout

I’m pretty sure it is.

I agree, stunt.

155 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:50:57pm

re: #149 SanFranciscoZionist

It seems like a terrible idea.

Why you’re doing a little pity party for yourself over this story is another question.

no pity just curious that some find this OK,? so why do you reject the idea and still want to mess w/me? seems odd?

156 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:51:05pm

re: #134 Varek Raith

Anything to hurt Obama.
Shit, how very much like the moonbats under Bush.

That is what kills me. Unbelievable.

157 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:51:37pm

re: #156 Rightwingconspirator

That is what kills me. Unbelievable.

Mah haid, it hertz!

158 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:51:59pm

re: #154 Bagua

I agree, stunt.

Yep.
Some of my FB friends, I see, are wondering the same thing I’ve seen mentioned here - what office is McChrystal going to run for?
Alternatively - it’s been suggested he has a job lined up as a commenter for Fox News.

159 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:52:11pm

re: #156 Rightwingconspirator

That is what kills me. Unbelievable.

Poor Obama, this hurts.

160 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:52:39pm

re: #120 Dark_Falcon

Nope, Obama is just another in a long line.
1956 - victory denied by US pressure to withdraw
1967 - victory denied by US pressure to stop
1973 - victory denied by US pressure to stop
Lebanon - victory denied by US time limit pressure
Gaza - victory denied by US time limit pressure

161 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:53:02pm

re: #150 Bagua

It’s a nontroversy.

Not really. It was all over the morning talk shows and the news. Everyone was all excited about it earlier. I finally got off my ass and actually read the article and I’m like ‘what the fuck’? That was nothing. I kept looking for the money quote and there was none. Zip. Nada.

162 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:53:36pm

re: #159 Bagua

Poor Obama, this hurts.

maybe a couple more concerts & some golf would benefit us all?

163 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:53:48pm

re: #81 Nekama

Very true. But war is serious stuff. It deserves thinking, and thinking some more, and playing all sorts of scenarios out. Bush blew it on Iraq, IMHO.

Crushing Saddam was the easy part. Now what do we do?

Wolfowitz and “the Iraqis will welcome us” and “the oil revenue will pay for it all” should be in Gitmo. He and Rumsfeld have killed more of our guys than the Iraqis ever could.

Colin Powell said, of going into Iraq, that it would be a ‘you break it, you bought it’ situation. Pretty much.

164 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:53:56pm

re: #158 reine.de.tout

Yep.
Some of my FB friends, I see, are wondering the same thing I’ve seen mentioned here - what office is McChrystal going to run for?
Alternatively - it’s been suggested he has a job lined up as a commenter for Fox News.

Well, that would make him some money while he writes his book. Unlike Sarah Palin, he won’t need a ghost writer.

165 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:54:07pm

So many awesome 40+ MPG cars we can’t get here mostly because of our stupidly draconian diesel standards. Canada can get a 70mpg diesel car, but not us!

166 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:54:11pm
So what did McChrystal say to get in so much trouble? Actually, it was mostly comments by his unnamed aides — dismissing top senators, calling Ambassador Richard Holbrooke “a wounded animal,” and describing McChrystal as unimpressed with Obama’s grasp of the Afghan War. For good measure, McChrystal also mocked Joe Biden on the record, and told Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings he felt “betrayed” by top ambassador Karl Eikenberry.

And more than just incendiary quotes, the article portrayed a climate of open disdain for civilian leadership by McChrystal and his inner circle, as Steve Clemons and others have pointed out.

You know what Racer X and Bagua? Just a nontroversy. No biggie.

Afganistan, CIC, 4-Star General & staff. No biggie.

167 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:54:34pm

re: #158 reine.de.tout

Yep.
Some of my FB friends, I see, are wondering the same thing I’ve seen mentioned here - what office is McChrystal going to run for?
Alternatively - it’s been suggested he has a job lined up as a commenter for Fox News.

No, the stunt is by Rolling Stone. They gained his confidence and did a hit job. No wonder he fired his PR staff. He got hoodwinked.

168 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:55:36pm

re: #104 reine.de.tout

That particular “troop” (McChrystal) respected Obama enough to vote for him.

What happened after that to make McChrystal lose respect is anybody’s guess, really.

McChrystal was way out of line, making those comments. Way out line.

Sometimes familiarity breeds contempt, I suppose.

169 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:55:51pm

re: #127 Fozzie Bear

It would be naive in the extreme to assume it has not always been so. Generals are political figures, like it or not.

And it is absurd in the extreme to believe that wars can be fought effectively and politically correct. Or that you can measure progress in simplistic terms, like tons of bombs dropped, number of enemy wounded/killed, or amount of territory taken. Likewise occupations are not short, they are not simple, and they do not come without a lot of controversy.

There is a reason that, at the top of the chain, the military answers to a civilian president and civilian government. But the civilians have to understand that this is not American Idol, you don’t wars based upon polls, withdrawals don’t rely upon timetables, and that the generals work best when they don’t have half of Congress riding on their backs.

170 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:56:07pm

re: #162 brookly red

maybe a couple more concerts & some golf would benefit us all?

Quite right. The President should remain fit and relaxed.

171 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:56:21pm

re: #161 Racer X

Not really. It was all over the morning talk shows and the news. Everyone was all excited about it earlier. I finally got off my ass and actually read the article and I’m like ‘what the fuck’? That was nothing. I kept looking for the money quote and there was none. Zip. Nada.

McChrystal has obviously been talking in a generally disparaging way to his subordinates about his Commander in Chief, which is different from disagreeing with with particular things.

The aides then talked to the magazine and reported what they knew of their bosses’ feelings toward Obama. McChrystal allowed the interviews to occur and had to have known what was in there, and apparently raised no issues.

If he did not say these things directly to the reporter, he did say them directly to his aides who then passed the info on to the reporter, with McChrystal’s knowledge and approval.

It’s just not done.

172 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:56:27pm

re: #166 Stanley Sea

You know what Racer X and Bagua? Just a nontroversy. No biggie.

Afganistan, CIC, 4-Star General & staff. No biggie.

I agree. Total nontroversy. Just a bunch of unnamed aides.

173 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:56:27pm

200hp diesel Mercedes C-class that gets 45mpg. and 268 foot-pounds of torque.

What was that about slashing our standard of living? Bullshit.

174 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:57:11pm

re: #167 Bagua

Not so sure. He got prior review. He had his chance.

175 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:57:27pm

re: #167 Bagua

No, the stunt is by Rolling Stone. They gained his confidence and did a hit job. No wonder he fired his PR staff. He got hoodwinked.

You think?
I don’t think he was hoodwinked, at all.
If he was, then he’s completely stupid.

176 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:57:33pm

re: #171 reine.de.tout

McChrystal has obviously been talking in a generally disparaging way to his subordinates about his Commander in Chief, which is different from disagreeing with with particular things.

The aides then talked to the magazine and reported what they knew of their bosses’ feelings toward Obama. McChrystal allowed the interviews to occur and had to have known what was in there, and apparently raised no issues.

If he did not say these things directly to the reporter, he did say them directly to his aides who then passed the info on to the reporter, with McChrystal’s knowledge and approval.

It’s just not done.

Two words:

Reverand…. .

Ah forget it.

177 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:57:44pm

re: #173 WindUpBird

That’s 368 ft-lbs of torque.

178 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:57:50pm

re: #121 WindUpBird

You did not even read that article.

Seriously, you are so stupid you defeat the word stupid

Apparently, neither did I. They’re using cumulative voting?

OY. THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END.

179 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:58:26pm

re: #176 Racer X

Two words:

Reverand…. .

Ah forget it.

eh?
‘splain?

180 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:58:41pm

re: #176 Racer X

Two words:

Reverand…. .

Ah forget it.

He’s a general???

181 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:58:58pm

re: #167 Bagua

No, the stunt is by Rolling Stone. They gained his confidence and did a hit job. No wonder he fired his PR staff. He got hoodwinked.

/well all things considered if he let a lefty rag inside the wire I do question his judgement…

182 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:59:25pm

re: #132 Stanley Sea

So you’re spinning if Obama keeps him on Obama will be “gamed” by a general?

Glad you are a Canadian, cause you are not on the side of the US.

That’s not what I implied at all, Stunley. If Obama lacks the balls to accept his resignation, it will be because Obama believes that getting rid of McChrystal will not be politically expedient. So it would be Obama gaming the US electorate, as usual.

And, Stunley, as a Canadian I want a strong and successful America. Canada is America’s largest trading partner and staunchest ally.

183 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 8:59:33pm

re: #180 Varek Raith

He’s a general???

No. He’s President.

184 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:00:24pm

re: #152 reine.de.tout

It was a terrible idea.
Which is why I personally don’t think it’ll catch on.

Yeah, it took me a reread to realize, after the build-up, that what they’re talking about is simply a cumulative voting process. We do, or did that in San Francisco. It’s no big deal, but I’ve never liked it.

185 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:00:30pm

re: #183 Racer X

No. He’s President.

If you think Wright is fair game, then so is this. No?

186 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:00:55pm

re: #166 Stanley Sea

You know what Racer X and Bagua? Just a nontroversy. No biggie.

Afganistan, CIC, 4-Star General & staff. No biggie.

Well then, that’s that, we all agree.

187 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:01:08pm

re: #160 Spare O’Lake

Nope, Obama is just another in a long line.
1956 - victory denied by US pressure to withdraw
1967 - victory denied by US pressure to stop
1973 - victory denied by US pressure to stop
Lebanon - victory denied by US time limit pressure
Gaza - victory denied by US time limit pressure

Israel won decisively in 1967, and was willing to stop, since further advances would have been very hard. In 1973, it was mostly Soviet pressure that ended the war. The Soviets were not willing to see Israel push west further into Egypt and threatened to intervene. You’re right about 1956 ans 2006. I’d call Gaza a win also, since its hard to see what more the IDF could have done short of reoccupying Gaza.

188 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:01:16pm

re: #167 Bagua

No, the stunt is by Rolling Stone. They gained his confidence and did a hit job. No wonder he fired his PR staff. He got hoodwinked.

hahaha you are so deluded about this it boggles the mind. All those things he said to a national magazine with gigantic distribution all over the world, and OH NO THEY’D NEVER PRINT THAT! Not in Rolling Stone!

If he really believed RS wouldn’t print all that juicy stuff he said, then McChrystal should be relieved of duty for being mentally disabled.

Man, the soldier sniffing here sometimes, it really is amazing. A general can do no wrong, the president can do no right.

189 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:01:33pm

re: #155 brookly red

no pity just curious that some find this OK,? so why do you reject the idea and still want to mess w/me? seems odd?

Read the article you posted.

I accepted your line about it, which is false, then I read it.

190 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:02:03pm

re: #167 Bagua

No, the stunt is by Rolling Stone. They gained his confidence and did a hit job. No wonder he fired his PR staff. He got hoodwinked.

You can’t be serious. Really? You forgot your sarc tags, or aren’t following this.

191 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:02:08pm

re: #188 WindUpBird

hahaha you are so deluded about this it boggles the mind. All those things he said to a national magazine with gigantic distribution all over the world, and OH NO THEY’D NEVER PRINT THAT! Not in Rolling Stone!

If he really believed RS wouldn’t print all that juicy stuff he said, then McChrystal should be relieved of duty for being mentally disabled.

Man, the soldier sniffing here sometimes, it really is amazing. A general can do no wrong, the president can do no right.

BUSH!!!
Wait…

192 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:02:08pm

re: #158 reine.de.tout

Yep.
Some of my FB friends, I see, are wondering the same thing I’ve seen mentioned here - what office is McChrystal going to run for?
Alternatively - it’s been suggested he has a job lined up as a commenter for Fox News.

I really hope not, I hope that he just had enough and decided to walk. His means were not the classiest, but I really hope he just wants to retire.

193 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:02:21pm

re: #189 SanFranciscoZionist

Read the article you posted.

I accepted your line about it, which is false, then I read it.

what is false?

194 webevintage  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:03:04pm

re: #18 Nekama

The Brits are really taking it in the shorts financially. Obama didn’t help things, and unnecessarily personalized it, by referring to BP as “British Petroleum”.

Seemed to add insult to injury.

Jesus.
THIS again?

195 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:03:04pm

Back on topic for a second:

I wonder how long it will take before the blowback against the moratorium, as a result of the decreased drilling, will take to develop in our politics. Will it be by this November’s elections?

196 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:03:37pm

re: #176 Racer X

Two words:

Reverand…. .

Ah forget it.


If you’re talking about Wright - I recall personally being very concerned with that relationship. As it has played out, it does not appear to have been particularly important enough to Obama to keep it up, thank goodness IMO. But the concern certainly existed.

I’m having trouble, though, how you think these two things tie together.

197 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:03:48pm

re: #147 Reginald Perrin

Did you miss the part of my post where it said Ontario will close all coal fired plants by the year 2014?

How could I have missed it when I referred to it in my post?

198 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:04:19pm

re: #190 Fozzie Bear

You can’t be serious. Really? You forgot your sarc tags, or aren’t following this.

I’ve been reading Rolling Stones for decades.

199 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:04:36pm

re: #192 SanFranciscoZionist

I really hope not, I hope that he just had enough and decided to walk. His means were not the classiest, but I really hope he just wants to retire.

That’s actually kind of what I’m thinking has happened.
He’s overseeing an impossible situation; and wants out.

200 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:05:02pm

Look, I can name ten things I like about Obama. I do not hate the man. He makes mistakes just like we all do. I do enjoy pointing them out because he is a high profile politician.

I find the outrage over this incident very interesting though. The moment it appeared a General (*gasp*) may have mocked the president or his administration, man the outrage flew. Now I see it was a bunch of ‘unnamed aides’ making comments.

Yawn.

201 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:05:03pm

re: #195 freetoken

Back on topic for a second:

I wonder how long it will take before the blowback against the moratorium, as a result of the decreased drilling, will take to develop in our politics. Will it be by this November’s elections?

There will be some excuse concocted to explain the suddenly jump in unemployment that will result as a consequence of the moratorium. Combined with the end of the temporary Census jobs, it should get us back into double-digit unemployment by November, if not earlier. The GOP no doubt is salivating at the potential this has to turn the route they’re currently looking at into a massacre at the pols.

202 garhighway  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:05:11pm

re: #195 freetoken

Back on topic for a second:

I wonder how long it will take before the blowback against the moratorium, as a result of the decreased drilling, will take to develop in our politics. Will it be by this November’s elections?

I doubt it. I suspect that outside the Gulf it is seen as the prudent thing to do.

203 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:05:16pm

re: #193 brookly red

what is false?

You were concern trolling, and got caught. Give it up. Find another issue that seems in a three word summary to be terribly nefarious, but in reality is just a dumb idea.

204 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:06:05pm

re: #202 garhighway

I doubt it. I suspect that outside the Gulf it is seen as the prudent thing to do.


You’re probably right.
Sadly.
Because it is not the prudent thing to do.
Ah well.

205 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:06:07pm

re: #160 Spare O’Lake

A long and bi-partisan line, one mutters to oneself.

206 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:06:13pm

re: #165 WindUpBird

So many awesome 40+ MPG cars we can’t get here mostly because of our stupidly draconian diesel standards. Canada can get a 70mpg diesel car, but not us!

Guys, why the downdings? WUB is right that the US laws on diesel don’t make sense anymore. If a car uses far less fuel, it can afford to put out some addition pollutants per gallons and still pollute less by using far fewer gallons.

207 Walking Spanish Down the Hall  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:06:22pm

re: #89 Spare O’Lake

America is simply no longer willing to fight to win. And much to Israel’s dismay, America will not allow Israel to fight to win either. It’s the new age of warfare…fighting to win a military victory is barbaric and forbidden.

Define winning.

What conditions should prevail in the losing state after the winning happens?

208 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:06:29pm

Wingnuts iz not need factses! We got Konstitution!

209 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:06:37pm

re: #200 Racer X

Look, I can name ten things I like about Obama. I do not hate the man. He makes mistakes just like we all do. I do enjoy pointing them out because he is a high profile politician.

I find the outrage over this incident very interesting though. The moment it appeared a General (*gasp*) may have mocked the president or his administration, man the outrage flew. Now I see it was a bunch of ‘unnamed aides’ making comments.

Yawn.

You stole my yawn.

210 garhighway  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:06:44pm

re: #201 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

There will be some excuse concocted to explain the suddenly jump in unemployment that will result as a consequence of the moratorium. Combined with the end of the temporary Census jobs, it should get us back into double-digit unemployment by November, if not earlier. The GOP no doubt is salivating at the potential this has to turn the route they’re currently looking at into a massacre at the pols.

I doubt that whatever unemployment is attributable to those 25 rigs can be separated from the regional unemployment spike caused by the spill.

211 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:06:53pm

re: #185 Varek Raith

If you think Wright is fair game, then so is this. No?

Should we go there? Because everyone says Wright is off the table. I’m OK with that. But don’t be hypocritical about it.

Unnamed aides. Sheesh.

212 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:07:11pm

re: #195 freetoken

Back on topic for a second:

I wonder how long it will take before the blowback against the moratorium, as a result of the decreased drilling, will take to develop in our politics. Will it be by this November’s elections?

My guess is not until the 2012 elections, at least in terms of impact on the oil price.

213 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:07:30pm

The stupidity astounds.
G’nite, y’all

214 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:07:39pm

re: #188 WindUpBird

hahaha you are so deluded about this it boggles the mind. All those things he said to a national magazine with gigantic distribution all over the world, and OH NO THEY’D NEVER PRINT THAT! Not in Rolling Stone!

If he really believed RS wouldn’t print all that juicy stuff he said, then McChrystal should be relieved of duty for being mentally disabled.

Man, the soldier sniffing here sometimes, it really is amazing. A general can do no wrong, the president can do no right.

What did he actually say? One quote please.

215 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:07:48pm

re: #211 Racer X

Should we go there? Because everyone says Wright is off the table. I’m OK with that. But don’t be hypocritical about it.

Unnamed aides. Sheesh.

Why not?
It’s all bullshit in the end, anyway.

216 goddamnedfrank  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:07:55pm

re: #88 brookly red

so bird, how do you justify 1 person being able to vote six times more than another person? Please I would love to hear the logic.

But that’s not the situation, each and every voter in that election get’s six votes to apportion as they wish, all on one ballot.

Just exactly how much of a rock stupid, dishonest little fool are you? I only ask because you’re setting the bar awfully fucking high with this one.

217 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:07:59pm

re: #200 Racer X

Look, I can name ten things I like about Obama. I do not hate the man. He makes mistakes just like we all do. I do enjoy pointing them out because he is a high profile politician.

I find the outrage over this incident very interesting though. The moment it appeared a General (*gasp*) may have mocked the president or his administration, man the outrage flew. Now I see it was a bunch of ‘unnamed aides’ making comments.

Yawn.

It’s the fact that not only did his aides run their mouths to RS with his (presumed) consent, but that they ran the second draft of the article by him and he asked for no changes. The man had to know this shit was going to blow up in his face, at the very least making him look like he can’t maintain control over his own staff. If RS published an article of White House aides recalling Obama badmouthing McChrystal and he had likewise allowed the article to go to print without revision, there would be calls right now by the GOP for his head on a platter by sundown tomorrow.

218 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:08:03pm

re: #203 Fozzie Bear

You were concern trolling, and got caught. Give it up. Find another issue that seems in a three word summary to be terribly nefarious, but in reality is just a dumb idea.

where you breath sucka, this is my state let alone my country and anything but 1 person 1 vote is questionable to me. ps bite me.

219 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:08:13pm

re: #193 brookly red

what is false?

It’s not ‘some people get to vote more than other people’, it’s a cumulative voting arrangement.

220 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:08:27pm

re: #196 reine.de.tout

If you’re talking about Wright - I recall personally being very concerned with that relationship. As it has played out, it does not appear to have been particularly important enough to Obama to keep it up, thank goodness IMO. But the concern certainly existed.

I’m having trouble, though, how you think these two things tie together.

Unnamed aides.

221 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:08:31pm

re: #165 WindUpBird

What exactly is wrong with that car and US standards?

222 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:08:58pm

re: #218 brookly red

where you breath sucka, this is my state let alone my country and anything but 1 person 1 vote is questionable to me. ps bite me.

ZOMG LIBRULS VOTED SIX TIMES!!!!///

223 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:09:00pm

re: #201 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

re: #202 garhighway

I doubt it. I suspect that outside the Gulf it is seen as the prudent thing to do.

Well, the increase in unemployment will be mostly a regional thing, and I don’t know if it will be large enough to affect the national numbers in a way that will be noticeable to the general public.

What I am thinking of is that time in the future when oil prices start to rise seriously, along with everything that depends on oil (such as gasoline.)

At that time some wily political hack will be able to put together a campaign that will directly link the rise of oil with the moratorium (even though such causes and effects are difficult to accurately attribute.)

224 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:09:11pm

re: #220 Racer X

Unnamed aides.

The general got to look at the draft before it was published. He declined to make any changes.

225 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:10:00pm

re: #188 WindUpBird

hahaha you are so deluded about this it boggles the mind. All those things he said to a national magazine with gigantic distribution all over the world, and OH NO THEY’D NEVER PRINT THAT! Not in Rolling Stone!

If he really believed RS wouldn’t print all that juicy stuff he said, then McChrystal should be relieved of duty for being mentally disabled.

Man, the soldier sniffing here sometimes, it really is amazing. A general can do no wrong, the president can do no right.

Once again a hysterical post that is nearly illegible and makes no real point other than to call your target stupid.

226 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:10:07pm

re: #167 Bagua

No, the stunt is by Rolling Stone. They gained his confidence and did a hit job. No wonder he fired his PR staff. He got hoodwinked.

1st time, but I knew it would happen. Blame Rolling Stone.

227 blueraven  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:10:29pm

re: #39 Racer X

Because in the earlier thread people were just bashing the shit outta the guy. CNN was talking about a court martial. For what in particular? Not blindly loving Obama and everyone in his administration?

How about undermining the morale of the troops in the middle of a fucking war? Insubordination? Take your pick. He used “poor judgment” as the President said.

I don’t care if he resigns or gets the ax. If the President still has confidence in him to get the job done then so be it. If not, he should go.

228 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:10:40pm

re: #215 Varek Raith

Why not?
It’s all bullshit in the end, anyway.

Bingo!

I agree with you. It is all bullshit. Wright was bullshit; unnamed aides is bullshit.

229 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:10:47pm

I’m going to sing off now. Sleep well, all.

230 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:11:42pm

re: #229 Dark_Falcon

I’m going to sing off now. Sleep well, all.

YOU SING?!?!
:)
Nigth, DF.

231 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:12:10pm

re: #210 garhighway

I doubt that whatever unemployment is attributable to those 25 rigs can be separated from the regional unemployment spike caused by the spill.

33 rigs.

Plus support services.

Plus other services, catering, restaurants, hotels, transportation services like helicopters, supply services like boats (2 a day per rig, usually).

Approx 16% of Louisiana household earnings.

All the rigs except Deepwater Horizon could be working right now.
But they aren’t, and won’t be for several years if this moratorium goes on.

BTW - the panel that’s been commissioned to study this isn’t set to meet until next month sometime, for the first time, and it appears they plan to have a report completed in a year’s time. Will the moratorium be extended? It would seem so, since that panel is the group that’s supposed to make the recommendations on how to prevent these things.

232 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:12:17pm

re: #228 Racer X

Bingo!

I agree with you. It is all bullshit. Wright was bullshit; unnamed aides is bullshit.

I like playing both sides.
It’s fun.
:)

233 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:12:23pm

re: #216 goddamnedfrank

But that’s not the situation, each and every voter in that election get’s six votes to apportion as they wish, all on one ballot.

Just exactly how much of a rock stupid, dishonest little fool are you? I only ask because you’re setting the bar awfully fucking high with this one.

really so then why did they do it? why not 10 each? I am suspicious with anything other than 1 for 1 … if I am wrong so be it but something seems odd about this.

234 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:12:27pm

Apparently, cumulative voting = voter fraud, and generals aren’t responsible for their men.

It’s upside down world, apparently.

235 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:13:07pm

re: #224 Varek Raith

The general got to look at the draft before it was published. He declined to make any changes.

And?

236 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:13:15pm

re: #222 Fozzie Bear

ZOMG LIBRULS VOTED SIX TIMES!!!///

no that was acorn, be we have dealt with that already…

237 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:13:42pm

re: #226 Stanley Sea

1st time, but I knew it would happen. Blame Rolling Stone.

Blame for what? It’s a nontroversy.

238 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:14:13pm

re: #235 Racer X

And?

And nothing!
Silly.

239 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:14:24pm

re: #236 brookly red

Ahh yes, so registrations = votes too.

The stupid, it burns. G’night all, I can’t take any more dumb today.

240 webevintage  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:14:42pm

What happened to Macarther?

241 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:14:47pm

re: #218 brookly red

where you breath sucka, this is my state let alone my country and anything but 1 person 1 vote is questionable to me. ps bite me.

Why? Explain why you think a system in which EACH VOTER gets six votes to apportion is ‘questionable’. Bear in mind that you initially presented this as some voters being given more votes than others, which appears to be entirely false, unless there is some detail of the story I have not seen.

242 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:14:59pm

re: #222 Fozzie Bear

ZOMG LIBRULS VOTED SIX TIMES!!!///

ACORN stole the election!!11ty

/

243 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:15:00pm

re: #235 Racer X

And?

And the general had to have known that this shit would blow up in his face. At best, it makes him look incompetent, at worst it makes him looking like he’s trying to “martyr” himself. That he’s hoping that Obama will forced him to resign so that he can plow the goodwill from the ODS crowd into commercial and potentially political success.

244 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:15:20pm

re: #219 SanFranciscoZionist

It’s not ‘some people get to vote more than other people’, it’s a cumulative voting arrangement.

I trust your judgement but if it did not change the outcome then what was the point? be honest.

245 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:15:56pm

re: #182 Spare O’Lake

That’s not what I implied at all, Stunley. If Obama lacks the balls to accept his resignation, it will be because Obama believes that getting rid of McChrystal will not be politically expedient. So it would be Obama gaming the US electorate, as usual.

And, Stunley, as a Canadian I want a strong and successful America. Canada is America’s largest trading partner and staunchest ally.

NAFTA!

246 garhighway  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:16:42pm

re: #244 brookly red

I trust your judgement but if it did not change the outcome then what was the point? be honest.

You don’t have to trust his judgement. You just have to read the article you posted.

247 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:16:58pm

re: #231 reine.de.tout

33 rigs.

Plus support services.

Plus other services, catering, restaurants, hotels, transportation services like helicopters, supply services like boats (2 a day per rig, usually).

Approx 16% of Louisiana household earnings.

All the rigs except Deepwater Horizon could be working right now.
But they aren’t, and won’t be for several years if this moratorium goes on.

BTW - the panel that’s been commissioned to study this isn’t set to meet until next month sometime, for the first time, and it appears they plan to have a report completed in a year’s time. Will the moratorium be extended? It would seem so, since that panel is the group that’s supposed to make the recommendations on how to prevent these things.

Actually the rigs will soon be working, but in Brazil and elsewhere outside of the US. There will also be a similar number of people employed, but they will be Brazilian jobs, not American.

The US jobs and all the support jobs will be gone.

248 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:18:06pm

re: #243 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

And the general had to have known that this shit would blow up in his face. At best, it makes him look incompetent, at worst it makes him looking like he’s trying to “martyr” himself. That he’s hoping that Obama will forced him to resign so that he can plow the goodwill from the ODS crowd into commercial and potentially political success.

I’m not going to guess about if or how he will plow this into financial gain. Dude has always been a bull in a China shop. Obama hired this man. He can deal with it.

249 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:18:07pm

re: #245 Stanley Sea

NAFTA!

Yeah. But you know NAFTA comes with Mexico plus that Clinton feller was behind it!

It’s a trap!

/

250 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:18:42pm

re: #247 Bagua

Actually the rigs will soon be working, but in Brazil and elsewhere outside of the US. There will also be a similar number of people employed, but they will be Brazilian jobs, not American.

The US jobs and all the support jobs will be gone.

Absolutely true!

And the way BP is handling their claims process, people are going to go broke and give up before it’s all over with.

251 Reginald Perrin  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:19:00pm

re: #197 Spare O’Lake

Then why did you say it was smoke and mirrors?
Do you think Samsung is spending 7 billion because they don’t believe they are going to be making money?

They have committed to building four factories devoted to green energy technology, is that smoke and mirrors too?

You wouldn’t be from Alberta would you? I know our wingnuts there love their tar sands and turn a blind eye towards the environmental devastation the tar sands projects have brought the region.

252 Macha  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:20:09pm

re: #167 Bagua

No, the stunt is by Rolling Stone. They gained his confidence and did a hit job. No wonder he fired his PR staff. He got hoodwinked.

He has been around too long to get” hoodwinked” by media people. You don’t get where he is without being a savvy player. That dog ain’t gonna hunt, Bob.

253 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:20:10pm

re: #165 WindUpBird

So many awesome 40+ MPG cars we can’t get here mostly because of our stupidly draconian diesel standards. Canada can get a 70mpg diesel car, but not us!

Nice to see the karma on this post is in positive territory now.

254 Varek Raith  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:20:54pm

re: #253 Gus 802

Nice to see the karma on this post is in positive territory now.

FUEL EFFICIENT CARS ARE BAD FOR THE OIL INDUSTRY!1!1!1!

255 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:22:11pm

re: #247 Bagua

Actually the rigs will soon be working, but in Brazil and elsewhere outside of the US. There will also be a similar number of people employed, but they will be Brazilian jobs, not American.

The US jobs and all the support jobs will be gone.

And amazingly, so much concern earlier for all the jobs Westinghouse is taking to Mexico.

And nobody gives a rat’s ass about the jobs going to Brazil and Africa.
It’s odd.

256 blueraven  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:22:20pm

re: #247 Bagua

Actually the rigs will soon be working, but in Brazil and elsewhere outside of the US. There will also be a similar number of people employed, but they will be Brazilian jobs, not American.

The US jobs and all the support jobs will be gone.

Every major oil company has the same disaster plan as BP did for oil spills. Which is obviously screwed up. Is it unreasonable to ask them to provide a coherent plan in case of another event? It just doesn’t seem so to me. The oil companies should get on the ball and get those plans together, pronto!

257 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:22:29pm

re: #246 garhighway

You don’t have to trust his judgement. You just have to read the article you posted.

her judgement… and yes I am still trying to figure out why 1 to 1 was not applied… if it changed nothing why did it take a court order? OK everone here seems to be OK with it so who am I to question why a court would change 1 to 1, to 6 to 1… surely it changed nothing and that was why it took a court order.

OK I get it now sorry to have upset anyone.

258 webevintage  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:22:33pm

Once again Obama is in a no win situation.

If he relives the General of duty then he is an ass who will throw anyone “under the bus” and OMG! you can’t criticize Obami without getting fired. What about free speech!!111!!! If only SARAH was President….
OR
The President is weak if he puts up with this shit from his Generals, You gotta be a hard ass and make the tough decisions and not let these military types push you around.

259 Dancing along the light of day  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:22:36pm

re: #231 reine.de.tout

*smooch*
{{{Reine}}}
Be well.

260 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:22:45pm

re: #254 Varek Raith

FUEL EFFICIENT CARS ARE BAD FOR THE OIL INDUSTRY!1!1!1!

We can’t have that them there gubernment tell us how much gasoline my car burn! It’s my right and it’s in that there Constertution that the Feds can’t regulate the car companies!!11ty

/

261 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:23:15pm

So still, not ONE actual quote attributed to McChrystal?

OK. I’ll give you one then:


“Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” McChrystal says with a laugh. “Who’s that?”

“Biden?” suggests a top adviser. “Did you say: Bite Me?”

Yawn indeed.

262 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:23:38pm

BTW, night time tornadoes are marching their way across the upper midwest - dangerous situation these night storms.

263 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:23:42pm

re: #252 Macha

He has been around too long to get” hoodwinked” by media people. You don’t get where he is without being a savvy player. That dog ain’t gonna hunt, Bob.

Nontravesy Macha. Hoo hum. So Rolling Stones puts out an edgy article, big deal. Lol.

264 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:23:50pm

re: #258 webevintage

Once again Obama is in a no win situation.

If he relives the General of duty then he is an ass who will throw anyone “under the bus” and OMG! you can’t criticize Obami without getting fired. What about free speech!!111!!! If only SARAH was President…
OR
The President is weak if he puts up with this shit from his Generals, You gotta be a hard ass and make the tough decisions and not let these military types push you around.

With the wingnuts? Nope, he’s in a no win situation. No matter what he does they’ll fabricate something to whine about.

265 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:24:02pm

re: #258 webevintage

Once again Obama is in a no win situation.

Agreed.

266 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:24:18pm

re: #233 brookly red

really so then why did they do it? why not 10 each? I am suspicious with anything other than 1 for 1 … if I am wrong so be it but something seems odd about this.

You’re wrong. Cumulative voting in a city area is usually used to get a better distribution of candidates in some way, often neighborhood-based.

You can like it or hate it. We tried it in San Francisco, to the accompaniment of some heads exploding.

The point is, you characterized it as some voters getting more rights than
other voters, which is completely incorrect. You leaped to a conclusion, based on what I am not sure. I then accepted your characterization of the article without proper reading, and thought, ‘well, that’s inappropriate, I assume a higher court will squash it’. We were both mistaken.

267 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:24:31pm

re: #261 Racer X

Yawn indeed.

It may be a “Yawn”, but it is still wrong, and even more so the entire package of quotes indicate a serious disregard for the civilian leadership.

268 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:24:37pm

re: #253 Gus 802

Nice to see the karma on this post is in positive territory now.

I don’t quite see why all the complaints about diesel. Some of the most restrictive “green” countries in Europe run primarily on diesel. I can’t remember ever renting a car in Europe that did run on diesel. Great milage.

269 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:25:03pm

re: #255 reine.de.tout

And amazingly, so much concern earlier for all the jobs Westinghouse is taking to Mexico.

And nobody gives a rat’s ass about the jobs going to Brazil and Africa.
It’s odd.

How many jobs did Westinghouse move to Mexico?

270 Political Atheist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:25:21pm

re: #255 reine.de.tout

And amazingly, so much concern earlier for all the jobs Westinghouse is taking to Mexico.

And nobody gives a rat’s ass about the jobs going to Brazil and Africa.
It’s odd.

Another poster here really surprised me the other day. It was as if our coastline has more value than Brazil’s. As if “good riddance” was the way to look at the rigs moving. As if those other continental shelf ecosystems are less important in the event of a spill. As if the rigs would be as closely watched as here in the aftermath.

As if it were another planet.

271 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:25:32pm

re: #267 freetoken

It may be a “Yawn”, but it is still wrong, and even more so the entire package of quotes indicate a serious disregard for the civilian leadership.

Yawn.

272 webevintage  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:25:57pm

re: #264 Gus 802

With the wingnuts? Nope, he’s in a no win situation. No matter what he does they’ll fabricate something to whine about.

Not even with the wingnuts.
I’m thinking of all the Villagers out there just waiting to see what will happen so they can claim how this is good news for John McCain.

273 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:26:37pm

re: #272 webevintage

Not even with the wingnuts.
I’m thinking of all the Villagers out there just waiting to see what will happen so they can claim how this is good news for John McCain.

True. And the Firebaggers.

274 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:26:48pm

re: #270 Rightwingconspirator

Another poster here really surprised me the other day. It was as if our coastline has more value than Brazil’s. As if “good riddance” was the way to look at the rigs moving. As if those other continental shelf ecosystems are less important in the event of a spill. As if the rigs would be as closely watched as here in the aftermath.

As if it were another planet.

Yep. Totally OK to drill for oil in someone else’s yard. Like they would care about the environment one-tenth as much as we do.

275 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:26:50pm

re: #248 Racer X

I’m not going to guess about if or how he will plow this into financial gain. Dude has always been a bull in a China shop. Obama hired this man. He can deal with it.

And he will deal with McChrystal, either by forcing him to resign in disgrace or by being forced to publicly apologize for having made an ass of himself. One thing you can be sure of, if nothing else, is that the careers of those aides who shot their mouths off are over. And that’s a blanket statement, since RS not printing any names means it could have been any of his aides who were quoted. No officer with aspirations of one day having even a single star is going to want aides on their staff who can’t keep their lips shut when it comes to politically damaging remarks.

276 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:27:12pm

re: #258 webevintage

Once again Obama is in a no win situation.

If he relives the General of duty then he is an ass who will throw anyone “under the bus” and OMG! you can’t criticize Obami without getting fired. What about free speech!!111!!! If only SARAH was President…
OR
The President is weak if he puts up with this shit from his Generals, You gotta be a hard ass and make the tough decisions and not let these military types push you around.

OR

The Obama administration made a big mistake in putting this guy in the post.

OR

The general has some real concerns about the directives that he has been handed by the Obama administrations which has fucked up the war effort.

Obama is a shover, not a leader. A no win by a no leader.

277 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:27:23pm

re: #244 brookly red

I trust your judgement but if it did not change the outcome then what was the point? be honest.

It probably did change the outcome, and it sounds as though the idea was to allow more candidates from heavily Latino areas of the burb to take seats. Read the article on cumulative voting, I understand the basic concept, but it’s more math than I can explain coherently.

However, the outcome was based on equal rights between all voters in the election. Each voter is still being treated equally, they’re just being given a different way of choosing candidates they prefer.

278 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:27:35pm

re: #256 blueraven

Every major oil company has the same disaster plan as BP did for oil spills. Which is obviously screwed up. Is it unreasonable to ask them to provide a coherent plan in case of another event? It just doesn’t seem so to me. The oil companies should get on the ball and get those plans together, pronto!

Absolutely!
And if they have their plans ready in two weeks, they should be allowed to start drilling again, not wait six months!
Right?

279 garhighway  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:27:42pm

re: #270 Rightwingconspirator

Another poster here really surprised me the other day. It was as if our coastline has more value than Brazil’s. As if “good riddance” was the way to look at the rigs moving. As if those other continental shelf ecosystems are less important in the event of a spill. As if the rigs would be as closely watched as here in the aftermath.

As if it were another planet.

Do we have the ability to impose environmental standards on other countries like Brazil? Should we engage in a race to the bottom and tolerate lousy practices because if we don’t, someone else will?

280 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:27:53pm

re: #256 blueraven

Every major oil company has the same disaster plan as BP did for oil spills. Which is obviously screwed up. Is it unreasonable to ask them to provide a coherent plan in case of another event? It just doesn’t seem so to me. The oil companies should get on the ball and get those plans together, pronto!

Of course we can all see that there need to be improvements in preparedness. The issue here is the moratorium.

281 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:28:03pm

re: #187 Dark_Falcon

Israel won decisively in 1967, and was willing to stop, since further advances would have been very hard. In 1973, it was mostly Soviet pressure that ended the war. The Soviets were not willing to see Israel push west further into Egypt and threatened to intervene. You’re right about 1956 ans 2006. I’d call Gaza a win also, since its hard to see what more the IDF could have done short of reoccupying Gaza.

United States: The US, on the other hand, had hesitated and restrained Israel, a country which the diplomatic corps considered a liability and an “unviable client state.”

Toward the end of the war, it was evident to the US that they, from their point of view, would want to pressure Israel, but that because Israel had won the victory on its own, without US military supplies, Israel was relatively independent. This caused some acrimony in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Senators Hickenlooper and Fulbright believed that the Israeli purchases of French armaments were financed by US Jewish charitable contributions to the UJA. On June 9, 1967, they discussed the idea of terminating the tax deductible status of Jewish charities in the US, in order to deprive Israel of its independence of action. However, the Senators concluded that they could never get such a bill through the Senate, because “they” [the Jews] controlled the Senate.

The “client state” had hitherto attracted only pro-forma support from the US, but this had caused the US to be perceived as a friend of Israel by Arab states. Nasser had caused universal hate for the US in the Arab world by inventing the myth of US military support for Israel. Israel, the “unviable client state,” had demonstrated an unsettling capacity for independent military action that went well beyond the prewar intelligence estimates. The US now prepared to recoup their losses by trading on their influence with Israel to put themselves in a position to recover the land of the Arabs. The professional diplomats of the U.S. diplomatic service and State Department had been anti-Israel since before the inception of the state. They had told Truman that a Zionist state would support the USSR and be a communist state. They had dominated US foreign policy until 1967, and their influence had essentially caused the US to renege on its solemn commitments, as well as imperiling Israel. The results of the Six Day war created a new reality for Israel, in that the US slowly and reluctantly came to view Israel as a strategic asset. It traded on Israeli strength to gain a foothold in the Middle East, used Israeli intelligence to make up for its woeful shortcomings in that area in the Middle East, and used Israel as a silent but vital ally in the 1991 Desert Storm war against Iraq. That story still cannot be told in full in order not to upset Arab sensitivities. The lesson of the Six Day War in this regard should not be forgotten.
zionism-israel.com

282 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:28:03pm

re: #271 Racer X

Yawn.

Stop using my yawns! This is the last time I’m telling you.

283 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:28:26pm

re: #269 Bagua

How many jobs did Westinghouse move to Mexico?

Not sure.
I don’t believe it was anywhere near the 10,000 to 20,000 that will be lost in Louisiana, and probably a similar number in Mississippi.

284 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:28:41pm

re: #275 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

And he will deal with McChrystal, either by forcing him to resign in disgrace or by being forced to publicly apologize for having made an ass of himself. One thing you can be sure of, if nothing else, is that the careers of those aides who shot their mouths off are over. And that’s a blanket statement, since RS not printing any names means it could have been any of his aides who were quoted. No officer with aspirations of one day having even a single star is going to want aides on their staff who can’t keep their lips shut when it comes to politically damaging remarks.

Exactly. I understand heads have already rolled, which leads me to believe McChrystal did not even bother to review the article prior to being published. Bad move. He should have cared.

285 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:29:01pm

re: #273 Gus 802

True. And the Firebaggers.

Second time I’ve seen that expression. What’s a firebagger?

286 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:29:32pm

re: #282 Walter L. Newton

Stop using my yawns! This is the last time I’m telling you.

*chortle*

287 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:29:47pm

re: #270 Rightwingconspirator

Another poster here really surprised me the other day. It was as if our coastline has more value than Brazil’s. As if “good riddance” was the way to look at the rigs moving. As if those other continental shelf ecosystems are less important in the event of a spill. As if the rigs would be as closely watched as here in the aftermath.

As if it were another planet.

Good points.
The rigs here are the best there are.
The laws here are among the most stringent in the world.

288 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:29:52pm

re: #285 SanFranciscoZionist

Second time I’ve seen that expression. What’s a firebagger?

Someone who sets their balls on fire before having someone else… never mind.

289 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:30:14pm

re: #277 SanFranciscoZionist

It probably did change the outcome, and it sounds as though the idea was to allow more candidates from heavily Latino areas of the burb to take seats. Read the article on cumulative voting, I understand the basic concept, but it’s more math than I can explain coherently.

However, the outcome was based on equal rights between all voters in the election. Each voter is still being treated equally, they’re just being given a different way of choosing candidates they prefer.

yes it did change the outcome… all I got to say on the matter.

290 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:30:17pm

re: #285 SanFranciscoZionist

Second time I’ve seen that expression. What’s a firebagger?

From Fire Dog Lake…

A person nominally of the political left viewed as excessively critical of President Barack Obama, especially if the tendency is to reflexively or obsessively criticize him and seemingly not other political figures. Etymology: Jane Hamsher’s popular, left-leaning FireDogLake blog was regarded by Democratic moderates as having gone around the bend in being hypercritical, such as when Hamsher appeared on Fox News to denounce Obama’s Health Care Bill, got involved with Neocon zealot Grover Norquist and even reportedly Tea Party activists. Thus, FireDogLake + Teabagger.

urbandictionary.com

291 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:30:29pm

re: #288 Walter L. Newton

Someone who sets their balls on fire before having someone else… never mind.

Hmmm. Sort of a sexual flaming Sambuca concept?

292 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:30:54pm

re: #283 reine.de.tout

Not sure.
I don’t believe it was anywhere near the 10,000 to 20,000 that will be lost in Louisiana, and probably a similar number in Mississippi.

You are forgetting the support multiple. That would make it 46,000 at minimum.

293 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:31:14pm

re: #284 Racer X

Exactly. I understand heads have already rolled, which leads me to believe McChrystal did not even bother to review the article prior to being published. Bad move. He should have cared.

And he may pay for that with his career. Wouldn’t be the first time and it sure as hell won’t be the last. Thing is, I can understand McChrystal’s frustration and flippant attitude towards the way he’s being jerked around. But he should know better by now that if the aides are so free with the press about their superior’s feeling about his boss, what else are they so free with?

294 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:31:15pm

re: #291 SanFranciscoZionist

Hmmm. Sort of a sexual flaming Sambuca concept?

Burning Man. /

295 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:31:20pm

re: #291 SanFranciscoZionist

Hmmm. Sort of a sexual flaming Sambuca concept?

I saw that at Cirque De Soleil.

296 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:31:21pm

re: #279 garhighway

Do we have the ability to impose environmental standards on other countries like Brazil? Should we engage in a race to the bottom and tolerate lousy practices because if we don’t, someone else will?

There is a huge amount of evidence that BP engaged in lousy practices.

I haven’t seen any evidence that other companies have; they are being punished merely for being in the same business as BP.

297 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:31:57pm

re: #289 brookly red

yes it did change the outcome… all I got to say on the matter.

I’m gritting my teeth so hard right now that my molars may shatter.

298 garhighway  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:32:15pm

re: #296 reine.de.tout

There is a huge amount of evidence that BP engaged in lousy practices.

I haven’t seen any evidence that other companies have; they are being punished merely for being in the same business as BP.

Using the exact same boilerplate spill contingency plans, including the use of the same dead expert, is a little hint.

299 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:32:15pm

re: #205 SanFranciscoZionist

A long and bi-partisan line, one mutters to oneself.

Your intellectual honesty is a pleasure.

300 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:32:27pm

re: #296 reine.de.tout

There is a huge amount of evidence that BP engaged in lousy practices.

I haven’t seen any evidence that other companies have; they are being punished merely for being in the same business as BP.

The problem is that clearly, nobody is really checking, or has been anyway.

301 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:32:29pm

re: #259 Floral Giraffe

*smooch*
{{{Reine}}}
Be well.

{smooch} backatcha!

302 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:32:51pm

re: #290 Gus 802

[Link: www.urbandictionary.com…]

Interesting. I’m not sure I quite know who these people are…I mean, the far left is totally hacked at Obama, but they hate everyone.

303 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:33:01pm

re: #298 garhighway

Using the exact same boilerplate spill contingency plans, including the use of the same dead expert, is a little hint.

They can have new plans ready in two weeks.
So, they should be allowed to begin drilling again, correct?

304 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:33:35pm

re: #300 Fozzie Bear

The problem is that clearly, nobody is really checking, or has been anyway.

Untrue.
All the 33 rigs that have been shut down HAVE been inspected since the blowout.

305 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:33:42pm

re: #296 reine.de.tout

There is a huge amount of evidence that BP engaged in lousy practices.

I haven’t seen any evidence that other companies have; they are being punished merely for being in the same business as BP.

What about this emergency plan thing where everyone has the late Dr. Lutz on the list as the go-to guy? Is that not really an issue, or what?

306 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:34:19pm

re: #304 reine.de.tout

Untrue.
All the 33 rigs that have been shut down HAVE been inspected since the blowout.

… and 2 very minor infractions were found and corrected.

307 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:34:30pm

re: #305 SanFranciscoZionist

What about this emergency plan thing where everyone has the late Dr. Lutz on the list as the go-to guy? Is that not really an issue, or what?

It was STUPID of them to have the same stupid plan. Really was. But they can have revised plans ready in two weeks.

308 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:35:19pm

re: #302 SanFranciscoZionist

Interesting. I’m not sure I quite know who these people are…I mean, the far left is totally hacked at Obama, but they hate everyone.

The argument from the far left would thus be now that McChrystal has essentially announced that this war is a “lost cause” as currently operated they would argue that he should proceed to announce an immediate pull-out from Afghanistan. Which he will not do.

309 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:35:22pm

re: #287 reine.de.tout

Good points.
The rigs here are the best there are.
The laws here are among the most stringent in the world.

Not only that but it would be simple to not approve the methods that led to the MC252 blowout. Not that anyone would again. Just announce the MMS will no longer approve that procedure.


Another solution would be to add another set of shear rams to the deep-water BOPs to insure they wouldn’t both hit a tool joint. A reserve back-up.

310 Ojoe  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:35:39pm

re: #276 Walter L. Newton

Obama is a shover, not a leader.

Quite concur.

After his presidential campaign, I doubted he could lead the whole of the country, and it now it sure looks as though he can’t.

Now I will go back to religion and firearms, etc.

Be back tomorrow.

311 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:35:44pm

re: #297 SanFranciscoZionist

I’m gritting my teeth so hard right now that my molars may shatter.

why such a stressful event? the courts changed the election rules & thus the outcome. It has been done before and sometimes for the better, but at the end of the day the court influenced the election.

312 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:36:28pm

re: #307 reine.de.tout

It was STUPID of them to have the same stupid plan. Really was. But they can have revised plans ready in two weeks.

OK…I do have to admit to a certain amount of distrust for the industry that may linger even after Dr. Lutz is off the list, but if they can come up with actual good plans, OK.

313 blueraven  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:36:38pm

re: #278 reine.de.tout

Absolutely!
And if they have their plans ready in two weeks, they should be allowed to start drilling again, not wait six months!
Right?

Yes absolutely. So the onus is on the oil companies.

314 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:36:42pm

re: #297 SanFranciscoZionist

I’m gritting my teeth so hard right now that my molars may shatter.

Impossible situ. You fact check, you did your job. Impossible to change what they want to fear.

315 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:37:08pm

re: #308 Gus 802

The argument from the far left would thus be now that McChrystal has essentially announced that this war is a “lost cause” as currently operated they would argue that he should proceed to announce an immediate pull-out from Afghanistan. Which he will not do.

Well, yes, but they have wanted that all along, regardless of what McChrystal does. It’s just a convenient peg to hang their hat on.

316 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:37:28pm

re: #313 blueraven

Yes absolutely. So the onus is on the oil companies.

In progress as we write.

317 Macha  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:37:57pm

Time for lights out here. A good night all.

318 garhighway  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:38:01pm

re: #311 brookly red

why such a stressful event? the courts changed the election rules & thus the outcome. It has been done before and sometimes for the better, but at the end of the day the court influenced the election.

Just like they did when they abolished the poll tax and the literacy test.

Shame on them.

C’mon. There is a long and tawdry history of local governments changing election rules to disenfranchise minorities. This is a remedy designed to redress that. This really isn’t very hard.

319 Stanley Sea  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:39:28pm

Gah, the defense of McCrystal is blowing my mind.

I’m going to read some sweet fiction now and take my mind to a sane place.

Carry on wingers! And the sanity responders. Good luck all.

320 garhighway  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:39:47pm

re: #319 Stanley Sea

Gah, the defense of McCrystal is blowing my mind.

I’m going to read some sweet fiction now and take my mind to a sane place.

Carry on wingers! And the sanity responders. Good luck all.

Ditto.

321 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:40:07pm

re: #318 garhighway

Just like they did when they abolished the poll tax and the literacy test.

Shame on them.

C’mon. There is a long and tawdry history of local governments changing election rules to disenfranchise minorities. This is a remedy designed to redress that. This really isn’t very hard.

as I said sometimes for the better… but to claim this had no effect on the outcome is well false.

322 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:40:17pm

en.wikipedia.org

Please, for the love of God, read that. Then kindly realize it’s just a way to allow everyone to divide their votes between candidates, if they so choose, or put their full electoral weight behind one candidate, if they so choose.

If you use a system in which everybody has 6 votes, really all you are saying is that you have a system where each person can divide their single vote 6 ways. It’s a semantic argument.

Cumulative voting is “one person, one vote”, in the sense that each person is exactly equally represented.

323 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:40:43pm

re: #319 Stanley Sea

Gah, the defense of McCrystal is blowing my mind.

I’m going to read some sweet fiction now and take my mind to a sane place.

Carry on wingers! And the sanity responders. Good luck all.

Goodnight Stanley!

Hey, did you know the Lakers won last week?

324 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:41:18pm

re: #309 Bagua

Not only that but it would be simple to not approve the methods that led to the MC252 blowout. Not that anyone would again. Just announce the MMS will no longer approve that procedure.

Another solution would be to add another set of shear rams to the deep-water BOPs to insure they wouldn’t both hit a tool joint. A reserve back-up.

On Anderson Cooper tonight, a man was interviewed, he ran the ROV’s. He said he saw a leak at the BOP on the ROV feed, and reported it to transocean and BP.

What should have happened, of course, and what other companies would have done, is they should have shut down, pulled the BOP and fixed it, and started up again.

That didn’t happen. They tested the BOP’s with the standard tests, and everything else SEEMED OK so they didn’t worry about the leak. They were behind schedule and over budget and just didn’t worry about it.

Now, I don’t know if that led to the blowout. But it certainly was against normal procedure; showing just how sloppy BP was with these things.

And Bagua - I don’t know- would that have been an indication of other problems in that formation?

325 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:41:26pm

re: #311 brookly red

why such a stressful event? the courts changed the election rules & thus the outcome. It has been done before and sometimes for the better, but at the end of the day the court influenced the election.

Yes, indeedy. And you will settle for that, having been deprived of your initial claim that the court was favoring some voters over others.

‘The court influenced the election’. Well, that sounds almost as scary.

326 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:42:26pm

re: #321 brookly red

as I said sometimes for the better… but to claim this had no effect on the outcome is well false.

No one claimed that. YOU claimed that some voters were being favored over others.

Question: which voters did you imagine these to be, and why?

327 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:42:43pm

re: #323 Racer X

Goodnight Stanley!

Hey, did you know the Lakers won last week?

What a riot.

328 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:44:18pm

McChrystal’s “crime,” in the end, is that he broke the unwritten rule, which is that you don’t air your grievances about your boss where he can hear it. You and your buddies can sit the break room, the locker room, your office, the local bar, wherever you prefer to blow off steam and badmouth your boss all you like. But you don’t do it to his face and you sure as hell don’t do it in front of the press, even if indirectly.

329 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:44:27pm

re: #327 Bagua

What a riot.

It was a very mild riot, as riots go. Those were the gangbangers on Thursday. The real fans were great yesterday during the parade!

330 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:44:33pm

re: #325 SanFranciscoZionist

Yes, indeedy. And you will settle for that, having been deprived of your initial claim that the court was favoring some voters over others.

‘The court influenced the election’. Well, that sounds almost as scary.

I am OK with that, it is the truth. I wish the had not influenced the election & some day you may be on the wrong end of it too… I still like 1 to 1 voting but we will have to wait and see.

331 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:44:37pm

re: #319 Stanley Sea

Gah, the defense of McCrystal is blowing my mind.

I’m going to read some sweet fiction now and take my mind to a sane place.

Carry on wingers! And the sanity responders. Good luck all.

There is a wing defending McCrystal? Who’s doing that?

332 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:45:24pm

re: #297 SanFranciscoZionist

I’m gritting my teeth so hard right now that my molars may shatter.

Here’s an interesting bit of trivia regarding the Federal judge in that case that adopted the cumulative voting for that town:

Stephen C. Robinson

Robinson was a federal judge on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Robinson was nominated by President George W. Bush on March 5, 2003, to a seat vacated by John S. Martin, Jr.. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on September 17, 2003, and received commission on September 22, 2003.

Woot!

333 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:46:04pm

Argh.
Too sleepy to think straight, much less type.
g’night all.
I guess I’ll be back in the a.m. with the rest of the wingnut contingent. Although the conversations here, I must say, are very interesting.

334 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:46:19pm

re: #331 BryanS

There is a wing defending McCrystal? Who’s doing that?

/his troops?

nawww couldn’t be.

335 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:46:29pm

re: #331 BryanS

There is a wing defending McCrystal? Who’s doing that?

I made the mistake of pointing out that McChrystal’s ‘crimes’ were being waaaayy overblown. Some here did not like that too much.

336 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:46:55pm

re: #207 b_sharp

Define winning.

What conditions should prevail in the losing state after the winning happens?

Once upon a time the winner got to dictate the terms of peace following that unconditional surrender of the loser. When has that happenned since WWII?

337 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:47:04pm

re: #332 Gus 802

Woot!

Well, good for him.

338 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:47:35pm

re: #335 Racer X

I made the mistake of pointing out that McChrystal’s ‘crimes’ were being waaayy overblown. Some here did not like that too much.

Warmonger blood in the water and all.

339 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:48:02pm

re: #328 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

McChrystal’s “crime,” in the end, is that he broke the unwritten rule, which is that you don’t air your grievances about your boss where he can hear it. You and your buddies can sit the break room, the locker room, your office, the local bar, wherever you prefer to blow off steam and badmouth your boss all you like. But you don’t do it to his face and you sure as hell don’t do it in front of the press, even if indirectly.

Isn’t insubordination in the military a serious issue? Don’t know that this rises to a “crime”, but I would fire anyone who treated me a McCrystal treated Obama. I like Kratuhammer’s take on it—McCrystal should tender his resignation, Obama should conclude that McCrystal is the most technically capable of executing the current strategy, and finally Obama brandishes the offer of resignation to restore the credibility of his authority.

I would not blame Obama for firing McCrystal over this though, and I’m no fan of Obama.

340 Fozzie Bear  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:48:30pm

re: #335 Racer X

He was either insubordinate, or tolerant of insubordination in his inferiors. How is it hard to understand that this, at the very least, shows a grave lack of judgment on McCrystal’s part?

341 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:48:34pm

re: #337 SanFranciscoZionist

Well, good for him.

Yep. Well, you know the meme would be that cummalative voting was pushed by an “activist judge.”

342 brookly red  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:49:38pm

well I gotta go, but thank you all for the civil discourse so rare these days.

343 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:49:39pm

re: #334 brookly red

/his troops?

nawww couldn’t be.

Their defending his tell-all to the Taddler? Doubt it. Defending him as an officer and someone they agree on military policy with, I would guess they would.

344 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:50:17pm

re: #340 Fozzie Bear

He was either insubordinate, or tolerant of insubordination in his inferiors. How is it hard to understand that this, at the very least, shows a grave lack of judgment on McCrystal’s part?

Perhaps.

The really really funny part?

The “wingnut” blogs are all calling for his head.

345 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:50:44pm

re: #324 reine.de.tout

Was the leak in the BOP’s hydraulics? If so than that was a maintenance issue that may have resulted in the sheer rams not having enough force to close fully. But it wouldn’t say anything about conditions down hole. I’m watching the video now.

346 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:51:36pm

re: #335 Racer X

I made the mistake of pointing out that McChrystal’s ‘crimes’ were being waaayy overblown. Some here did not like that too much.

Ahh—it still crosses a line in my mind. Obama could still choose to keep him. However McCrystal has to offer resignation as has been reported he’s ready to do.

347 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:51:53pm

re: #329 Racer X

It was a very mild riot, as riots go. Those were the gangbangers on Thursday. The real fans were great yesterday during the parade!

Were they even fans who attended the game?

348 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:52:09pm

re: #342 brookly red

well I gotta go, but thank you all for the civil discourse so rare these days.

It’s nearly one in New York. Go to sleep!

349 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:52:15pm

OK, the really really really funny part?

No one is talking about the cover of Rolling Stone!

Image: gagarollingstone.jpg

350 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:52:30pm

re: #339 BryanS

Isn’t insubordination in the military a serious issue? Don’t know that this rises to a “crime”, but I would fire anyone who treated me a McCrystal treated Obama. I like Kratuhammer’s take on it—McCrystal should tender his resignation, Obama should conclude that McCrystal is the most technically capable of executing the current strategy, and finally Obama brandishes the offer of resignation to restore the credibility of his authority.

I would not blame Obama for firing McCrystal over this though, and I’m no fan of Obama.

“Insubordination”? What lawful order did McChrystal refuse to carry out? McChrystal fraked up, he allowed his dirty laundry to be spread on the White House lawn by Rolling Stone, and at best he’ll face being forced to perform some act of submission to help Obama save face. But it does not rise to the level of “insubordination.”

351 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:53:32pm

re: #347 Bagua

Were they even fans who attended the game?

No. They were gangbangers who went to Staples center specifically to cause trouble. None of them had tickets ($400 each minimum for game 7).

352 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:53:41pm

re: #350 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

“Insubordination”? What lawful order did McChrystal refuse to carry out? McChrystal fraked up, he allowed his dirty laundry to be spread on the White House lawn by Rolling Stone, and at best he’ll face being forced to perform some act of submission contrition to help Obama save face. But it does not rise to the level of “insubordination.”

PIMF

353 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:53:59pm

re: #344 Racer X

Perhaps.

The really really funny part?

The “wingnut” blogs are all calling for his head.

Who? And why? Just general respect for the chain of command?

354 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:55:32pm

re: #349 Racer X

OK, the really really really funny part?

No one is talking about the cover of Rolling Stone!

Image: gagarollingstone.jpg

Well.

That’s a very fine behind the young lady has.

And she appears prepared to defend it.

355 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:56:33pm

re: #350 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

“Insubordination”? What lawful order did McChrystal refuse to carry out? McChrystal fraked up, he allowed his dirty laundry to be spread on the White House lawn by Rolling Stone, and at best he’ll face being forced to perform some act of submission to help Obama save face. But it does not rise to the level of “insubordination.”

Maybe there is a definition as you suggest in the military—I’m thinking about employment law. I can fire anyone for the kind of behaviour McCrystal engaged in because the behaviour is in defiance of authority. That defiance of authority is the definition of the word insubordination.

356 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:56:39pm

Why McChrystal Has to Go
It is intolerable for military officers to mock senior political officials, including ambassadors and the vice president.

SNIP

Gen. McChrystal’s just-published interview in Rolling Stone magazine is an appalling violation of norms of civilian-military relations. To read it is to wince, repeatedly—at the mockery of the vice president and the president’s special representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan, at the sniping directed toward the U.S. ambassador, at a member of his staff who, when asked whom the general was having dinner with in Paris said, “Some French minister. It’s so [expletive deleted] gay.” The quotes from Gen. McChrystal’s underlings bespeak a staff so clueless, swaggering and out of control that a wholesale purge looks to be indicated.

SNIP

357 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:58:03pm

re: #355 BryanS

Maybe there is a definition as you suggest in the military—I’m thinking about employment law. I can fire anyone for the kind of behaviour McCrystal engaged in because the behaviour is in defiance of authority. That defiance of authority is the definition of the word insubordination.

Cheeky?

358 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 9:58:53pm

re: #353 SanFranciscoZionist

Who? And why? Just general respect for the chain of command?

Apparently.

359 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:00:23pm

re: #356 Gus 802

Why McChrystal Has to Go
It is intolerable for military officers to mock senior political officials, including ambassadors and the vice president.

Yes. Obama’s subordinates cannot mock their commander in chief and disrespect him publicly without eroding Obama’s authority.

The only reason to consider not firing him is if his military acumen is so suited to the task that it would harm the country to get rid of him. That has to be weighed against the erosion of authority the commander in chief must maintain among the military ranks.

360 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:01:05pm

re: #356 Gus 802

The quotes from Gen. McChrystal’s underlings bespeak a staff so clueless, swaggering and out of control that a wholesale purge looks to be indicated.

Now we’re getting to the meat of the matter. His underlings are out of control.

Wait, aren’t there guys Obama’s underlings?

361 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:01:44pm

Almost random topic:

I’m trying to watch “Man on Earth: The Triumph of Homo Sapiens” which was a Discovery Channel product (in conjunction with some UK company no doubt.) Host of the show is Tony Robbins.

What a disaster Robbins is as a science reporter. He fails on so many levels… yeah, I know, he is not a science reporter, but if he is going to play one on TV then he should act like one.

I don’t know what it is about the American TV audience, but it’s as if almost any science show has to skip the very sticky, and difficult bits, of real science. The lack of questions, and especially of perhaps unsolvable questions, makes the show go something like this: answer, answer, answer, answer…. etc, without taking the audience through the hypothesis development stages.

362 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:02:16pm

re: #357 Bagua

Cheeky?

My statement? Or you mean McCrystal’s comments?

363 engineer cat  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:03:21pm

O Pray For Me St Gaga Of The Vuvuzuelas
Help Me Be Pink And Fashionable In All My Mixed Fabric Washables
May I Tweet Ginormously And Be Hawt
Friend Me All Friends And DeFriend All My Enemies
Lo Though I Walk Through The Valley And Like Get Lost And End Up In The Hood Ferchrissakes
Thou Art My Homie
For Thine Is The Power Chord, The Dancing With The Stars, And Who Wants To Be A Millionaire
For Ever And Ever All Mine

364 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:03:47pm

re: #362 BryanS

My statement? Or you mean McCrystal’s Underling’s comments?

Fixed.

365 Bagua  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:04:18pm

re: #362 BryanS

My statement? Or you mean McCrystal’s comments?

You were searching for a word to describe General McCrystal.

366 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:04:43pm

re: #360 Racer X

Now we’re getting to the meat of the matter. His underlings are out of control.

Wait, aren’t there guys Obama’s underlings?

McChrystal wonders aloud what Biden question he might get today, and how he should respond “I never know what’s going to pop out until I’m up there, that’s the problem,” he says. Then, unable to help themselves, he and his staff imagine the general dismissing the vice president with a good one-liner.

“Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” McChrystal says with a laugh. “Who’s that?”

“Biden?” suggests a top adviser. “Did you say: Bite Me?”

367 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:05:09pm

…in private, Team McCharystal likes to talk shit about many of Obama’s top people on the diplomatic side. One aide calls Jim Jones, a retired four-star general and veteran of the Cold War, a “clown” who remains “stuck in 1985.”

368 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:05:32pm

McChrystal reserves special skepticism for Holbrooke, the official in charge of reintegrating the Taliban. “The Boss says he’s like a wounded animal,” says a member of the general’s team. “Holbrooke keeps hearing rumors that he’s going to get fired, so that makes him dangerous. He’s a brilliant guy, but he just comes in, pulls on a lever, whatever he can grasp onto. But this is COIN, and you can’t just have someone yanking on Shit.”

369 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:05:34pm

re: #361 freetoken

Most reporters are extraordinarily scientifically retarded. Would be a good idea if news outfits required their reporters to have a science degree in lieu of, or in addition to, a journalism degree.

370 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:06:30pm

re: #366 Gus 802

“Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” McChrystal says with a laugh. “Who’s that?”

And this is the worst quote attributed to McChrystal. The rest were unnamed aides and underlings.

371 freetoken  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:06:48pm

re: #369 BryanS

Well, Robbins is a TV entertainer, probably the least qualified to explain complex science problems.

372 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:06:50pm

“I’d rather have my ass kicked by a roomful of people than go out to this dinner,” McChrystal says.

He pauses a beat.

“Unfortunately,” he adds, “no one in this room could do it.”
With that, he’s out the door.

“Who’s he going to dinner with?” I ask one of his aides.

“Some French minister,” the aide tells me. “It’s fucking gay.”

373 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:08:18pm

re: #370 Racer X

And this is the worst quote attributed to McChrystal. The rest were unnamed aides and underlings.

There’s more.

He’s out of line and shouldn’t have done this piece for Rolling Stone.

McChrystal has to go. Well, of course that’s not up to me.

374 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:08:20pm

Well, I’ve stirred up too much shit today so I’m out.

375 Michael McBacon  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:08:37pm

Why can’t Mr. Hayward have his time-honoured dolphin hunt or fish-slapping match? Any soul who attacks British Petroleum is anti-American!

376 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:09:02pm

re: #355 BryanS

Maybe there is a definition as you suggest in the military—I’m thinking about employment law. I can fire anyone for the kind of behaviour McCrystal engaged in because the behaviour is in defiance of authority. That defiance of authority is the definition of the word insubordination.

Barring your being omniscient, you’d generally need an open act of defiance to take such actions, right? That seems to be McChrystal’s crime, not that he has a poor opinion of Obama, but that he voiced it in earshot of the press.

377 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:09:21pm

re: #370 Racer X

And this is the worst quote attributed to McChrystal. The rest were unnamed aides and underlings.

I get the impression that the comments from his subordinates kibitzing/interjecting in the same interview. They appear to be comments that McCrystal allowed to stand uncorrected.

378 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:12:15pm

re: #376 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Barring your being omniscient, you’d generally need an open act of defiance to take such actions, right? That seems to be McChrystal’s crime, not that he has a poor opinion of Obama, but that he voiced it in earshot of the press.

Yeah—I would say his airing to the press his issues was that open act of defiance. He could say all he said to the reporter directly to Obama or to his direct superiors and I wouldn’t consider that inappropriate. If he had so much criticism on his mind, he shouldn’t have granted the interview.

379 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:13:31pm

Or maybe not. Perhaps keeping McChrystal might be a good move by Obama.

Heck, I don’t know.

380 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:15:07pm

re: #379 Gus 802

Or maybe not. Perhaps keeping McChrystal might be a good move by Obama.

Heck, I don’t know.

By all accounts, he is very skilled at his job and may very well be the most capable of executing the current strategy. I agree with Krauthammer’s statement that it is a close call for that reason.

381 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:15:12pm
382 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:16:56pm

re: #360 Racer X

Now we’re getting to the meat of the matter. His underlings are out of control.

Wait, aren’t there guys Obama’s underlings?

Sure. But Obama can fire McChrystal, and only we get to fire Obama.

383 lostlakehiker  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:19:13pm

re: #77 brookly red

yes that is right a court can order that some people can vote 6 times… I got a problem with that but hey I am just a wingnut. I am sure it is all good.

You misunderstand. EVERYBODY can vote the exact same number of times. It’s different, but nobody is treated different.

384 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:19:15pm

re: #376 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Barring your being omniscient, you’d generally need an open act of defiance to take such actions, right? That seems to be McChrystal’s crime, not that he has a poor opinion of Obama, but that he voiced it in earshot of the press.

Well, yes. That’s the entire issue at hand.

385 Gus  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:20:25pm

re: #380 BryanS

By all accounts, he is very skilled at his job and may very well be the most capable of executing the current strategy. I agree with Krauthammer’s statement that it is a close call for that reason.

Anything can happen and we’ll find out tomorrow.

386 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:28:06pm

re: #378 BryanS

Yeah—I would say his airing to the press his issues was that open act of defiance. He could say all he said to the reporter directly to Obama or to his direct superiors and I wouldn’t consider that inappropriate. If he had so much criticism on his mind, he shouldn’t have granted the interview.

Personally, my concern is why he has so much criticism in the first place and what that criticism consists of. If the man believes the war effort futile or thinks he’s spending more time playing nice to politicians and ambassadors than he is directing the war effort, then I want to know about it. I don’t like the idea of the military being muzzled, of the airing of relevant grievances being viewed as “insubordination,” that every general who takes issue with civilian authority is viewed as a General Ripper looking to push us into WWIII. The military bows to civilian authority, but that doesn’t mean the civilians are always right.

387 blueraven  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:30:17pm

re: #376 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Barring your being omniscient, you’d generally need an open act of defiance to take such actions, right? That seems to be McChrystal’s crime, not that he has a poor opinion of Obama, but that he voiced it in earshot of the press.

No. That is not the problem. The General allowed a climate to exist where the civilian authority and chain of command was ridiculed and questioned. This had to be something that was well known beyond his top aides.
He should have never allowed any of this to happen. We are at war and he is the General responsible for the lives of our young men and women. This is much more than petty “office talk”.

388 BryanS  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:32:04pm

re: #386 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Personally, my concern is why he has so much criticism in the first place and what that criticism consists of. If the man believes the war effort futile or thinks he’s spending more time playing nice to politicians and ambassadors than he is directing the war effort, then I want to know about it. I don’t like the idea of the military being muzzled, of the airing of relevant grievances being viewed as “insubordination,” that every general who takes issue with civilian authority is viewed as a General Ripper looking to push us into WWIII. The military bows to civilian authority, but that doesn’t mean the civilians are always right.

Agreed to some extent. The course of action is to resign, and then go public. Someone leading a war effort should not be entitled to air his frustrations publicly and give the enemy the impression of disarray at the top even if that is true. Military officers do not have freedom of speech while they remain officers. Their choice is clear—communicate up the chain of command, resign and then speak, or shut up.

389 engineer cat  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:35:46pm

a glance at free republic reveals that ultima wingnuttia is reading this as mcchrystal’s way of criticising obama and alerting us to his socialist awfulness

peculiar, since there didn’t seem to be any criticism of policy, merely rudeness, disrespect, and insubordination

390 lostlakehiker  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 10:44:17pm

re: #384 SanFranciscoZionist

Well, yes. That’s the entire issue at hand.

Lincoln’s letter to McClellan: it is not because of your poor opinionre: #387 blueraven

No. That is not the problem. The General allowed a climate to exist where the civilian authority and chain of command was ridiculed and questioned. This had to be something that was well known beyond his top aides.
He should have never allowed any of this to happen. We are at war and he is the General responsible for the lives of our young men and women. This is much more than petty “office talk”.

There has never been a war in which the military did not ridicule the chain of command. Including each other.

391 Targetpractice  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 11:06:36pm

re: #388 BryanS

Agreed to some extent. The course of action is to resign, and then go public. Someone leading a war effort should not be entitled to air his frustrations publicly and give the enemy the impression of disarray at the top even if that is true. Military officers do not have freedom of speech while they remain officers. Their choice is clear—communicate up the chain of command, resign and then speak, or shut up.

The first and third might as well be one and the same, because his superiors no doubt value their cushy jobs and futures as lobbyists and civilian advisers too much to risk rocking the boat. The second would have actually made his “crime” worse, with one side spreading rumors that he’d been pressured into resignation for disagreeing with the CinC on time too many and the other side taking issue with his speaking up against the President when the war is still going on.

But I can’t see how this will play out in any way other than McChrystal’s resignation, so that Obama might save face. He can’t afford for the public to see him as unable to command respect and loyalty from his generals, no matter how badly he fraks up the war effort, and that any general who speaks out of turn will pay with his career.

392 Racer X  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 11:17:52pm

So, McChrystal is summoned to the White House HOURS after some of his ‘unnamed aides’ openly criticized the administration.

Within hours! ‘Get on a frikkin plane I want you in my office’. Not 8 hours after Rolling Stone came out with the article.

Yet…

BP, through their employee’s negligence, caused soon to be the worst oil spill in American history. A true ecological disaster for the gulf (planet). Billions of dollars lost, hundreds of thousands of jobs put at risk.

How long did Obama wait to make a phone call to BP? 50? 60 days?

Hmm…

393 sagehen  Tue, Jun 22, 2010 11:50:45pm

re: #84 Racer X

I think you bolded the wrong part.

Lenny Santiago, a spokesman for International Speedway, said the tax treatment helped the Daytona Speedway generate $1.9 billion a year in economic benefits to central Florida.

We spent $38 million and pumped almost $2 Billion into the economy. Isn’t that exactly how Stimulus is supposed to work?

Plus, it’s NASCAR Baby!


And it wouldn’t have generated that economic activity if the depreciation had been on a 15-year instead of 7-year schedule? I’m not convinced.

394 Gus  Wed, Jun 23, 2010 12:42:35am

re: #392 Racer X

So, McChrystal is summoned to the White House HOURS after some of his ‘unnamed aides’ openly criticized the administration.

Within hours! ‘Get on a frikkin plane I want you in my office’. Not 8 hours after Rolling Stone came out with the article.

Yet…

BP, through their employee’s negligence, caused soon to be the worst oil spill in American history. A true ecological disaster for the gulf (planet). Billions of dollars lost, hundreds of thousands of jobs put at risk.

How long did Obama wait to make a phone call to BP? 50? 60 days?

Hmm…

McChrystal is answerable to the Commander in Chief. McChrystal has already done enough damage with his comments on the Vice President in the Rolling Stone article and allowing his staff, that he chose, to also comment wildly and in an immature manner regarding strategy and other members of governments both foreign and domestic that do not meet the standard behavior expected of superior officer staff.

In a governing sense, McChrystal’s responsibilities as both an officer of the United State military and answerable to the president of the United States comes under the purview of President Obama. Comparing the actions of a US Army command general and his staff and its comments to the national media to the response of BP executive is highly irrelevant. McChrystal and his staff have breached the Constitutional requirements of a superior officer and staff under the command of the president whose office they have slandered.

395 RogueOne  Wed, Jun 23, 2010 3:21:02am

re: #366 Gus 802

McChrystal wonders aloud what Biden question he might get today, and how he should respond “I never know what’s going to pop out until I’m up there, that’s the problem,” he says. Then, unable to help themselves, he and his staff imagine the general dismissing the vice president with a good one-liner.

“Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” McChrystal says with a laugh. “Who’s that?”

“Biden?” suggests a top adviser. “Did you say: Bite Me?”

McChrystal has to go but the generals staff is spot on in their assessment of Biden. He’s an idiot. How anyone can spend that much time in office and still not have any realistic idea of how the world works is beyond me. He was wrong in his idea of splintering Iraq, He was wrong in pushing for a timetable to leave Iraq, and he’s wrong in pushing for a timetable in Afghanistan. He has no idea what he’s doing.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
3 weeks ago
Views: 441 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1