Over at the village of the banned, there is a great deal of hurt feelings over my Newbies guide of nasty folks post. In it, I referred to M, as one of the few women posters over there. My adoring fans are furious! They claim that there are many women over there. Scads of them!

It is absolutely true that there are some women in that august group. They are hurt that I did not give them little bios, so I shall endeavor to do so.

Before we get into that though, I feel the need to post what one of their admins, Savage, had to say about a female poster here.

Not only are you a whore and a slut and a sorry excuse for a female, you need a big fat dick up your ass, preferably in a supermax facility.

Cunt!

He used the C word.

OK, so we have a woman he does not like, silenced in his little mind, by a fantasy of anal prison rape laced with sexist slurs. Outbursts like Savage’s are not uncommon from either him or other male posters there. In fact, most of them have a certain fetish for anal rape fantasies. Women they do not like are routinely referred to as “whores, c*nts, sluts” and every other slur for women available - frequently in colorful combinations. They have a particular and often repeated, fantasy of “shutting these women up ” with sex acts.

As the grotesque and vile nature of these people washes over you, please consider what sort of wretched woman would associate with men who write such things. Please ask yourself what sort of “ladies” would tolerate such language directed at another woman?

For example, the ohhh so Christian Goddess of the Classroom was unmoved by this - the lady who wants to purge sex education and prurience from textbooks. Apparently, it is ok for women (that she thinks Jesus hates) to be forcibly sodomized. The same applies to the other “ladies” there. They are all of them, just as vile as the men in their views, however there is a certain spiteful hatred of other women, particularly ones who do not “play ball” that can be found in their writings. I will leave it to the female lizards to comment on what might drive a woman to so hate other women that she allies with scum like this. I will simply note that the phenomena clearly exists.

With this in mind - some notable female stalkers who feel the need for some attention:

Savage’s Girl: She is with a man who can write : “Not only are you a whore and a slut and a sorry excuse for a female, you need a big fat dick up your ass, preferably in a supermax” to a woman he never met. I feel deeply sorry for her, and hope that she someday seeks therapy, gains the internal pride and respect she needs, and finds the strength to leave him and find a good man. If you read this, you know that if he feels that way about other women, the second he disapproves of you, that kind of stuff will be directed at you. It is not different with you. He will not “get better.” Good luck to you.

M: Update. Her followers are convincing her that yes, really, she is pretty. They go so far as to assure her that I would masturbate if I could see her. Well those boys sure know how to compliment a lady and she is classy enough to see such things as a compliment. I say simply that if she were pretty in a real sense - as in the internal sense - she would not associate with such folks or feel any gratification from their attention. This is, of course, a recurrent theme.

Eliana: Eliana deeply angers me the most of all of them. I probably should not write a blurb about her because of this. My animus towards her stems from the fact that her nic is the Israeli menorah symbol with the word Israel clearly visible. Male or female, I am deeply offended by fellow Jews who engage in the behaviors and views espoused by these freaks. Torah is about social justice and the need to care for your fellow human beings with compassion and justice first and foremost. To see a Jew - marking themselves as a Jew - and screeching the same racist crap, the same nutty conspiracy theories and worst of all, disdain for those in need as the rest and full of general hatefulness, I am deeply hurt for my whole people. I will just say it. She is a disgrace that brings the whole Tribe down and so for that matter is Buzzy. Both of them should know what a rasha is. Yet, they revel in it. Both should know what an epikorus is, yet they are. Both are frankly no better than sadducim who reject the Law and co-opt with evil for their own gain. For those non-Jews who read this, that is about as harsh as it gets.

Princess Natasha: Not to be outdone by the foulmouthed boys on the site, this harridan writes things like “Ludmonkey needs to put his money where his gaping toothless c**k-holster is and start executin’. Yo, Ludwank, I do not believe in AGW…. you hysterical little Hitler wannabe bitch!” It seems her goal is seeking the approval of her group through screeching abuse. In many ways, this one gains favor with her men by adopting the routine of a “woman with a sharp tongue.” Since she never points it at her little friends, they think this is cute in a “she is so cute when she gets mad” kind of way. It should also be noted that like all of her male friends, she thinks that making gay slurs is the most devastating form of insult. She also really hates DF.

Carolina Girl: This one is a sort of incompetent Coulter wannabe. She has the same shrillness and incoherent rage, but she lacks the ability to be as articulate. What comes out instead, is a sort of mashed up mix of right wing talking points. Much like princess natasha, but without the true unhinged mania, and much like M, but without all the little stalker boys wanking over her, she attempts to compensate by having ever more bile and unhinged conspiracy lunacies. She is deeply racist, homophobic and batshit crazy as the rest.

Guggi: The nic puns on high priced accessories to broadcast that that she is girly and has class. Alas, Guggi is just not very bright. She believes she can masquerade as profound. She is a grammarian, who makes typos. She believes that irrelevant nitpicking followed by screeching insults is a form of debate. For example, if one should refer to the results of an important paper from 1965, but mistake the year, she will write something like

” you little pumpkin, the first warning came from the “Environmental Pollution Board of the President’s Science Advisory Committee” in 1965. Your reference is from 1966. No one needs your pseudo-scientific advise with your uneducated and unscientific language.”

Of course, what was in the paper, or the point of the reference, is lost on her. Thinking about that, the actual scientific content of the report, or something like that might damage her preconceived notions with actual thoughts. And by the way, the report is from 1965 which is what was actually said in the first place, and the word is advice not advise in that context. She is too stupid to even be a good nitpicker.

There are some other women on that site too. I really don’t feel like writing up blurbs about them, but their fraction of them will no doubt keep trying if they feel left out. The fact is that they are just as insane and hateful as the men. What is curious to me is that women could possibly be self respecting and associate with such men. What I am driving at is how some women sabotage other women who stick up for themselves and side with abusive and repugnant throwback men. That, I think is a broader discussion for the comments.

For those of you girls from there reading this, notice how none of you were called whores or bitches or c*nts or fantasized about getting violated? Instead you were castigated fror being foul-mouthed, racist, homophobic and vapid nutters- exactly like the men there are. Do hateful women like you even see the difference?

Of course, had I written something vile and hurtful like what is quite common on their own pages, but this time directed at them, they would all cry sexism in a shot. These women are proof that women can be just as lame as the men, only with vaginas.

Update: Princess Natasha is confirmed male. What prompts a man to write as a woman writing crazed sexist drivel is beyond me.