Breitbart.com not the same as when it’s namesake ruled the roost
Since Andrew Breitbart’s sudden death on March 1, his disciples have battled over which way the site should go forward.
A pretty interesting read.
Since Andrew Breitbart’s sudden death on March 1, his disciples have battled over which way the site should go forward.
A pretty interesting read.
4 comments
1 | Skip Intro Tue, Oct 23, 2012 5:00:04pm |
Breitbart.com is missing the most obvious reason for HuffPo’s success: Run a story on Kim Kardashian every single goddamned day, seven days a week. On the rare occasions when that isn’t possible, have a couple of sideboob stories instead.
2 | Tigger2 Tue, Oct 23, 2012 8:15:54pm |
They will soon figure out which is the craziest way to go then pick that rout.
3 | terraincognita Wed, Oct 24, 2012 1:13:39am |
I go to the Breitbart.com to experience true bigoted hate. It is not a dish served cold, but the main course…pure, transparent and self-embracing. They really, really hate you. Yes, they do.
4 | Destro Wed, Oct 24, 2012 6:39:56am |
re: #1 Skip Intro
I think we discussed it before on thepeoplesforum that Breitbart existed to run agitprop for the GOP.
The attention grabbing headlines are what passes for news info in the cyber age not so much the meat of the story.
I don’t think Breitbart was a true believer - I think he was a paid operative for the GOP - a mercenary.