re: #95 John Neverbend

I still am inclined to interpret his statements to mean just that, but my point is that the Wingnuts are wrong to fault him in the way that they have for that statement, if indeed he meant it (and I accept there is some doubt). I would simply argue that it’s not the most obvious explanation, although it’s not wrong to believe, on the basis of current scientific understanding, that increased earthquake activity could result from global warming. It’s almost certainly wrong in this particular case. However, it’s far far away from what Pat Robertson said.

Right before the quoted section, he’s talking about international relief efforts and the ships that are on their way.