re: #95 iceweasel

Yes, it’s real tolerant to let the religious beliefs of a few dictate the control of all women’s reproductive lives.

And super-tolerant to phrase it as ‘paying for people to have abortions”. My, there’s nothing inflammatory or misleading about that description, is there? (I especially like the little touch of saying “people”. What gender are these ‘people’ who are having abortions?)

I was thinking of ‘getting paid to do some freelance work’ this week; instead, I think I’ll ‘get paid to have an abortion’!
Hey, who doesn’t need holday money, amirite?

Why must you be deliberately offensive? Does this tactic often sway others to come to your line of thinking? Outlawing abortion would be wrong. IMO, tax payers funding abortions is also wrong. If a couple(yes, it takes two to tango) has a baby they don’t want then it’s up to them to do what they feel the right thing to do is. It’s not my problem or my business. I just don’t want to pay for others mistakes. Is that clear enough or are you going to find another way to misunderstand my point?