Comment

Andrew Breitbart and the Argument from Ignorance

1010
SteveB44/13/2010 2:42:14 pm PDT

re: #982 HoosierHoops

re: #949 darthstar


Well there are 2 possible options..SteveB4 really believes what he posts here and is on the up and up…And isn’t a sock of Christmas past
Or.. you folks know every registration we get a few banned Lizards trying to engaged lizards for whatever purpose and games..
Let’s welcome him with open arms and if he is a troll we get to enjoy kicking the crap out of him..
Don’t forget Charles has posted that he has allowed known trolls in just so we can have fun discovering and grilling them up in the past…
/So SteveB Expound on your points…

re: #991 Cato the Elder

re: #953 SteveB4


1. “Hello, I’m new here.” √

2. Stupid, racism-minimizing talk about “hurtful language” in first comment. √

3. Assertion that said language was used to ramrod through legislation. √

4. “What, me trolling?” √

5. “I’m new here, remember?” √

6. Comments like the above, refusing to give own opinion, crawling up pundit’s ass instead. √

Troll. Check.

If by “racism-minimizing” you mean that I think the passage of the bill is a much more important issue than some inbred anonymous rednecks in a crowd shouting names, then I suppose I am.