re: #990 LudwigVanQuixote

Sal, one thing at a time. It is very difficult to discuss this with you because you move around all over the place. So, sticking to the science, you have claimed a “conclusive experiment” with “conclusive mathematics” to back up your views. I have very seriously challenged very large flaws in both your methodology and analysis.

I will happily get to your other claims after we have dispensed with this.

So please tell me why my criticism of your “conclusive” results is invalid. Then we will move on.

I have no problem backing up anything I have said. G-d knows I have posted link after link and written explanation after explanation. However, one thing at a time.

Defend your contentions or acknowledge the flaws in them.

You cannot find a flaw in the mathematics and I have previously posted, and reposted in this very thread, why your objections are irrelevant. It is YOU who has to demonstrate why the current climatological consensus on this issue is, according to you and almost no one else, grievously wrong.