re: #1049 wozzablog

that doesn’t really answer either of her points you quote.

What was the tone of the ACORN/Ayers coverage on CNN?… a story can be covered a lot without it being presented as a threat.

And - just because ACORN/Ayers were mentioned more (by name) on CNN it doesn’t mean by a long chalk that they were the biggest stories.

What was the tone of CNN or NBC’s coverage?
I’m sure that FOX took a harder look at Ayers and ACORN, and why not? Isn’t that what journalists are supposed to do?
The point here is that she was inaccurate in her portrayal of news coverage.
She’s spinning as much as any of the networks…each to support their own agenda.