re: #1043 Sigma_x

All this feigned righteous indignation over helping people circumvent the in-and-out rule is a little much, if you ask me.

I got called a con-man over and over again, and when I asked bagua to specify how, exactly, I qualify as a con-man, if I don’t charge anyone anything at any time, he disappears.

No, it’s not “legal.” But you know what the “punishment” is for violating it? You get a response from the SEC warning you against violating it again within a 90 day period. And if you violate it again? You get your account put on restriction for 90 days.

Not exactly robbing a bank. But if it help your argument that it somehow makes me a con-man, you do what you gotta do.

It’s not your blog.
You’re here pimping something that is illegal, on a blog owned by Charles Johnson, who is the name that everyone knows, and if anyone will get a letter or a visit, it will be Charles Johnson, not you.

Don’t you understand that?

Not to mention, it’s just unethical to promote illegal activity, regardless of whether the outcome is jail or a letter. It’s just wrong. Do you have any ethics or morals whatsoever?