re: #1036 Nimed

Arbitration laws by definition use a different set of criteria for conflict resolution than common courts. They require the consent of both parties to be binding, usually have a limited scope, and are not inherently discriminatory.

Well worded, and I have not disputed such.

Religious arbitration courts are “discriminatory”,

Word to your mother. Is that not what I have been saying?

but only in the same trivial sense in which you cannot participate in a bunch of Sacraments unless you are of Catholic faith.

Right, but there is a significant dissimilarity between Catholic Sacrament as a rule, and murdering gays and rape victims simply because they are gay or have been raped as a law. Sharia Law.

I offer this not as deference, but as an illustration of difference.