re: #104 Charles Johnson

Read that earlier. Then I re-read it. I still have no idea what point he’s trying to make, other than a vague denial of right wing racism.

Which is pretty rich, coming from someone associated with the National Review, where they had to disassociate from not one, but TWO white nationalists this year.

As far as I can tell his argument is “Step 1: Remember all those times when everyone else said we were being racist? Well we weren’t - so let’s do even more of that stuff! Step 3- Profit!”