re: #110 lawhawk

Cognitive dissonance at work.

And then there’s the bit about cribbing video stills from Inglorious Basterds? Where Jewish members of the US Army (trained, armed and equipped accordingly) are sent on a mission to kill Hitler, but actually botch a revenge mission by a Jew who saw her family murdered by Landa? How does that actually prove anything about the well-regulated militia and the right to bear arms?

It doesn’t.

Why not use stills from “Django Unchained”?