re: #1111 Obdicut

I made one, and only one point of analogy: They are both agreements that govern groups of people that those people did not explicitly vote for or endorse.

They are both modifiable, and, eventually, reject-able by those people, as well.

I’m not sure why that was hard to grasp. I made it very explicitly clear.

Come now. What you did was declare I should make arguments instead of assertions - the assertion being that unions are not analogous to State Constitutions. Then you offered an argument contrary to my assertion. Now I’ve replied with one of my own. Are you confused on how this argument thing works?

I guess I need to make clear that there are no useful analogies to be drawn between them? I mean, a whale and a needle both have eyes but that’s not very useful to point out.