re: #1119 Obdicut

No, that’s not the discussion. You’re begging the question. There is no reason to suppose that unions should need annual recertification, and what I’ve shown— and what others have shown— is that group agreements, in general, do not require that group— even a group that has never explicitly endorsed that agreement— to reaffirm it.

All the examples used to show this were dissimilar groups! I have to recap this?

What it boils down to is that you’re saying there’s no reason to suppose unions should need recertification even if the members aren’t pushing for it. What I’m saying is that there’s nothing about a union that should prevent us from deciding it ought to be forced to.

is that a clear enough position to work from?