You post papers from March 2006 (no estimate), March 2005 (no estimate), January 2007 (predicting 0.5 - 1.4 meters), a dead link, February 2006 (no estimate), a hysterical March 2007 Hansen paper, and a July 2007 paper. At least three of these came out BEFORE the 2007 IPCC estimate, and NONE of them had the benefit of the info. from the Bristol paper.

/and you accuse ME of relying on out-of-date science!

Got anything current?

I didn’t think so; credible current papers would have to take the close correlation between IPCC 2007 and Bristol 2009 into account. Which is why they don’t make such grandiosely catastrophic claims.

At least not any more.