re: #1183 Salamantis

Oh yeah; and I brought the August 28th, 2009 Science Daily article that supersedes the ecohuddle link to the discussion, too:

Small Fluctuations In Solar Activity, Large Influence On Climate
[Link: www.sciencedaily.com…]

Cutting edge science; get it while it’s fresh!

/and get that stale old superseded shit outta here

Sal, and once again you dodge the points I am bringing. You are being nothing more than insulting and then you go on a ding spree. How mature.

But before we get back to your ignorance, here is what was written about your newest article, by me several days ago.. Too bad you didn’t read it, or the article…

Here is the abstract from the paper itself. You see, this is referring to a very technical detail of things that might need to included into present models to predict el nino in one part of the Earth’s system during 11 year cycles.

The warming trend is much larger than 11 years.

Some seem to think that any climate article with the word sun in it, is somehow a magic bullet. This is just false. Suppose for an instant that you were correct beyond your wildest dreams, and that decreased solar activity did indeed have a pronounced effect on the rate of warming…

WE ARE STILL WARMING EVEN THOUGH THE SUN IS GIVING US A BREAK! what would that mean for when things get back to normal? But here is the abstract of the paper this article talks about. Please do us the kindness of pointing out the part that contradicts AGW.

One of the mysteries regarding Earth’s climate system response to variations in solar output is how the relatively small fluctuations of the 11-year solar cycle can produce the magnitude of the observed climate signals in the tropical Pacific associated with such solar variability. Two mechanisms, the top-down stratospheric response of ozone to fluctuations of shortwave solar forcing and the bottom-up coupled ocean-atmosphere surface response, are included in versions of three global climate models, with either mechanism acting alone or both acting together. We show that the two mechanisms act together to enhance the climatological off-equatorial tropical precipitation maxima in the Pacific, lower the eastern equatorial Pacific sea surface temperatures during peaks in the 11-year solar cycle, and reduce low-latitude clouds to amplify the solar forcing at the surface.

Now how does that contradict anything?

Sal I am tired of wasting my time with you. You did not read the paper you brought. You refuse to look at the paper you just brought. You do not acknowledge any fact that you do not wish to see. You duck and evade all direct questions pointed at you. You do this as some sort of strange cover for the fact that you do not know anything.

You do not care to debate science. You do not understand science and you insult me by wasting my time.

Enough of you.

Answer the questions put to you, or realize that you are a fraud a fake and a particularly stupid liar.