re: #112 Charles Johnson

You didn’t “prove” anything. Here’s how the CBO page describes the two ways of looking at it:

So in point of fact, the CBO does not disagree with the CAP analysis. They’re trying to be balanced about their presentation to avoid accusations of partisan bias, as always, but their own scoring shows that CAP’s analysis is not just “spin.”

Is the one of those deals where someone is having a hard time believing that a partisan organization couldn’t possibly be right? It’s reminding me of all the teeth gnashing about Nate Silver (whose predictions turned out to be pretty much on target.)