re: #71 Lateralis

Really…apologist. I could careless what Sarah Palin or any politician thinks about anything. Although, the more the left freaks out the more money she is going to make. The focus on this tragedy should not be on anything but the killer that pulled the trigger. I posted the examples because there is plenty of examples of rhetoric on both sides that is questionable. However, Charles you are always so fanatic about science but when it comes to this situation, is it ok to make a causal link when there is none?

Could you please reconcile the bolded part with the italicized part? If I called Sarah Palin an “enemy of humanity”, would that be over the line? How about if I said that she was trying to kill your grandparents? Would that be over the line?

If you whine about inflammatory rhetoric, and simultaneously claim it has no effect, then what is your point? Can you please pick one of the two mutually exclusive deflections?