re: #134 Mr. Hammer

A quick search of LGF for “Roy Spencer” only turned up a single comment, but I get the point that he’s a quack. Could someone post a link that you respect regarding his credibility on the issue?

As I’ve pointed out several times, when Spencer is forced (e.g., by journal editors) to play by the rules of science he does fine… it’s when he’s playing out in the world of the laity that he starts to go his own way, pushing his own religious and political views over those he can back up scientifically.