re: #129 Talking Point Detective

I’m hoping that lizard brain-power can be put to helping to deconstruct the “fake” document claims about the Heartland documents.

If the one document is a “fake,” it does make sense to be as far out in front of that as possible.

Here’s a post from WUWT? that pretty well-summarizes the current state of the “fake” document perspective.

[Link: wattsupwiththat.com…]

I discuss some of the details in comments at desmogblog:

desmogblog.com

WUWT wrongly - I think - asserts that metadata has been deleted. Metadata is intact. The PDF was created by native EPSON scanning software. So that’s not an argument for fakery.

However, I’m afraid we may have a repeat of the Rathergate. Sad, if so.