re: #135 Bagua

I respectfully disagree; I am referring to major errors that appear in the far shorter and influential synthesis report under the direct responsibility of the IPCC Chair Dr RK Pachauri. They apply to the most alarming predictions dealing with crucial regions that have become “poster issues” to-wit, the Amazon, the Himalayan Glaciers and Africa. All false, all based upon advocacy reports, not peer reviewed science.

Again, you’re promoting ideas that are not true.

The Himalayan glaciers ARE in danger. The Amazon rain forest IS in danger. And there are many, many climate change issues in Africa.

The fact that a very few statements in the report about these areas have been shown to be in error has absolutely no effect on the mountains of data that show the very real problems they face from AGW.