re: #153 Justanotherhuman

No, there are better ways to depict real women who have purpose in their lives. Not by stereotyping them as “princess” in a democratic society anyway. It’s a one-dimensional approach to complicated human beings and I would argue that it’s sexist.

Are famous men described as “princes”? If they’re described as royalty, they’re “kings” first and foremost, not the lesser title of prince.

“Merchant Prince’, “Robber Barons” and mere “Captains of Industry”. Why are we analyzing a blog cartoonist?