re: #147 goddamnedfrank

[Embedded content]

Odd: if they (who?) have any “remains”, i.e., bones, (however sturdy or delicate) that they suspect might be Amelia Earhart’s: can’t these be tested using modern DNA analysis against any living relatives? I know Amelia didn’t have any children (and only one sibling, AFAICT) - but there should be enough contemporary Earharts (of some degree of connection) around to do a useful comparison.

After all, if they could identify the remains of King Richard III after 500+ years and 18 (?) generations removed, Amelia Earhart ought to be easy…