re: #164 iceweasel

I didn’t get the impression you were disagreeing with me, so s’all good.

Much like criminal proceedings, determining motive is highly important. I can call someone like Tubman a “radical outside of the mainstream”, but it is how I choose to use that truth that defines my stance.

One could use the same phrase to describe Galileo, and it would certainly be true. What direction one takes with that truth is what defines their stance on the issue.

Re: Kagan’s relation to Marshall. Gross misstep. Utterly stupid and short sighted. Doesn’t anyone play chess anymore?