re: #17 wrenchwench

And that’s exactly the attitude I am talking of. bullshit your bullshit. I never blamed all Muslims. That’s something you insinuated into the conversation as most people do. You deny human nature. We profile, its part of our defense mechanism, whether you like it or not.

And when attacks are being directed against civilians in dozens of countries around the world and the vast majority of them are in the name of Allah, you might want to ignore that fact. Others can’t get it out of their minds. It doesn’t make them bigoted or racist, it makes them human.

You want to talk about bad logic? How about the moral relativity that puts suicide bombers that purposely targets innocent people on par with soldiers of sovereign nations trying to prevent those suicide bombers from committing mass murder. That’s bad logic, and at the same time, that’s becoming the politically correct approach, morally relativising all the different sides. Ignoring circumstance and intent.

When the President of the United States strips out a most central common denominator of terrorist attacks that have taken place on US soil, or were foiled before they could be conducted, that’s bad logic. And as much as you want to deny, and while American may not necessarily be at war with Islam, Islam, is at war, with the west. And if you don’t want to believe it that’s your prerogative. But if simultaneous attacks take place in Berlin, London and Paris this week, the rest of the world will most likely disagree with you.

So why don’t you come off your high horse know it all attitude and accept that no matter how much you want to deny it, no matter that now all Muslims support terror, most major attacks on the West (not to mention in the East too), are launched in the name of Islam.