re: #165 researchok

Just because they are funded by conservative money doesn’t mean they are a propaganda outlet.

By that measure, anything funded by Soros ought to be equally suspect.

And the NA does have a good reputation.

Moreso, I read the piece carefully. I haven’t seen anyone point out any substantive errors.

The criticism of the piece at this time is unwarranted,

Did you see the title of the book written by the author of that article? He’s clearly biased. And those aren’t “conservative” funders, they are right-wing bigoted lying propagandist funders. I don’t know what books and websites are funded by Soros, but he’s not railing against gay marriage or lying about science.Which makes this statement

By that measure, anything funded by Soros ought to be equally suspect.

a visit from the Magical Balance Fairy. She’s not welcome here.