re: #187 AntonSirius

I gotta head out, so I’m just going to leave it at this: I think it’s a better response to the right wing bullshit narrative to say “Our positions evolve when we learn new things (such as X and Y and Z on Benghazi), why don’t yours?” than it is to say “My NYT link is better than your WND link,” especially when the link you’re pushing is now a bit out of step with subsequent reporting.

The New York Times report is absolutely not “out of step” with anything. It’s a straightforward account of the events at that point.

My opinions absolutely do evolve when real evidence is presented. But I haven’t seen anything at all that makes me doubt the veracity of the NYT report.

And you still have never said why you think the militants would lie about their motivations.