re: #177 SteveMcGaziBolaGate

The most threatening thing I saw so far is that they will “put the judge on notice”. Do you have anything more threatening than that? I never make the argument the you said I did. So I repeat my questions: What excuses did I make? (I notice that one hasn’t been answered), and what threats did they make against the judge?

Rhodes said that the Rowan County sheriff should have blocked U.S. Marshals from detaining Davis, but since neither the sheriff nor the state’s governor will do their “job” and “intercede” on behalf of Davis, the Oath Keepers will have to do it instead. “As far as we’re concerned, this is not over,” he said, “and this judge needs to be put on notice that his behavior is not going to be accepted and we’ll be there to stop it and intercede ourselves if we have to. If the sheriff, who should be interceding, is not going to do his job and the governor is not going to do the governor’s job of interceding, then we’ll do it.” - See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/oath-keepers-send-armed-guards-protect-kim-davis-us-marshals?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter#sthash.XcWhhmUs.dpuf

THAT is a threat.