re: #189 Charles

Not really a lot. A few, but only if they were truly obnoxious. Gordon got away with posting here for years.

Also to be fair to you.. and for everyone else reading…

It is possible to argue with Charles - in the sense that you form a cogent and well backed up argument. Charles is intellectually honest. He can and does evolove his view. This is not a weakness, but rather the sign of someone who can think.

What he does not like - and no one should blame him - are people who start flipping out at him or acting like children. Everyone does this from time to time, but there is a certain line where clearly respect has been lost.

Over that line, it’s his blog and I don’t blame him one bit.