re: #200 Ming

Interestingly, I’m confident that if there were hard evidence for a God, many people who currently believe in God would turn elsewhere, perhaps to a new “super-God”. They didn’t embrace the idea of “God” because of their inclination for rational, scientific inquiry! :) People like Neal DeGrasse Tyson would be exicited about God and want to learn as much as they can about Her or Him, but I don’t expect that many of today’s current “believers” would stick around.

Wow, that’s beyond arrogant.

How do you know how “many people who currently believe in God” would react if hard evidence for a God were found? On what facts are you basing this conclusion that they’d create a new “super-God”? Why wouldn’t they be ecstatic at finally having been proven correct?

You seem to be conflating belief in God with a rejection of rational, scientific inquiry—why? How do you explain all the people who are believers and love science, some of whom are in fact scientists themselves?

How do you know why any given individual, apart from yourself, embraces anything? The answer is you don’t.

Logical #fail. Try again.