re: #203 Dark_Falcon

It means what you and the others here decide it should mean.

I have no interest in placing blame or anything else on you. I want you to think about your stances based on objective fact and not on ideology. Teddy Roosevelt came out of a Democratic ‘machine’ and he is one of the greatest presidents we ever had.

You’re a good man, but you don’t examine your stances based on rationality. The only thing I want is for you to free yourself from whatever it is traps you, and examine things carefully.

For example, in the next thread, you said:

That is why I used the phrase “objectively pro-Islamist Terror”. An action is objectively pro-terror if its primary effect is to strengthen the Islamist enemy

The GOP denial of AGW has a primary effect of strengthening the Islamic enemy. The money that funds terror, that funds the propaganda against Israel, is money from oil that the Middle East makes because we do not take the lead in alternative energy.

I’d like you to think hard about things like that, and about how deep your knowledge of fiscal matters really are.