re: #204 HappyWarrior

Yeah aooarebtky so. She was implying that he wasn’t going to be marrying for love but just for the benefits. We had a Facebook group where GMU Dems, Republicans, and others could talk the issues. It was started by a guy who had been by in the College Republicans but started drifting left after meeting some of our people. A lot of obnoxious right wing types in that group so I had to leave.

Yes, but if you wanted to marry for the benefits and you’re gay, you just marry someone of the opposite sex. That fails the most basic logic test.