re: #209 Spare O’Lake

I call it a mosque because unlike others I acknowledge the indisputable fact that it is the religious component of the development i.e. the mosque, which attracts the constitutional protection and hence the unassailable legality.
It is the wisdom of the decision which I have and continue to question, and I have told you why - empathy for many 9-11 victims and fear of widespread religious strife in America.
You can believe whatever you want about my motives, but your characterization of my “fomenting the strife” seems to me a bit of an overstatement to say the least.

Actually the fact that it is private property makes it unassailable. The issue of religious orientation hasn’t (and won’t) come into it, because it isn’t relevant.

Have you ever questioned the wisdom of criticizing a Sufi for things that Wahhabists did?