And, those reps, whose districts include aerospace companies, also don’t realize that the accused NASA expenditures on climate studies in large part are just more anti-climate science agiprop. Satellites are expensive, but most science satellites are cheap, and the NASA expenditures of science satellites to study the Earth are multi-disciplinary.

If those reps don’t want NASA to study Earth’s climate, then they don’t want those satellites launched… but wait… satellites take rockets to get into orbit, so science mission satellites mean spending money on the rocket industry… in those congressmen’s district….

I’m confused, but no where near as much as those congressmen.