re: #206 Dr. Matt

You’re excused.

The critical words are: ‘reasonable belief’. If the shooter acted unreasonably, then the law does not protect him. But I remind you that road-raging people have at times shattered the windows of those they are angry at and attacked them. So the argument that the shooter acted unreasonably cannot in my opinion be dismissed out-of-hand. I do not think he was in fact being reasonable, but nonetheless it must be shown why he was being unreasonable.

Note: I admit I look at these sorts matters from a legal not moral perspective. It’s how I see such things and I’m not going to change on that point.