re: #209 Spare O’Lake

I call it a mosque because unlike others I acknowledge the indisputable fact that it is the religious component of the development i.e. the mosque, which attracts the constitutional protection and hence the unassailable legality.

You have repeatedly proven that you don’t know shit about the constitution. Again, in this case, you prove it: it is not that it is a mosque that gives it constitutional protection, but that the only grounds it is being objected to on are that the builders are Muslim.

Why do you have the impression you know anything about the US Constitution, when you’ve been repeatedly so very wrong about it, so many times?

It is the wisdom of the decision which I have and continue to question, and I have told you why - empathy for many 9-11 victims and fear of widespread religious strife in America.

Why are you fomenting that strife, then, with your repeated attacks on Rauf?

You can believe whatever you want about my motives, but your characterization of my “fomenting the strife” seems to me a bit of an overstatement to say the least.

You’ve been called out for it by Charles. You ride the bottom ten every day because of the stupid shit you say. Acting surprised is silly.