Ok, I tried to read Geller’s post, just so I would know what you guys are discussing. I got to the point where she wrote “When news broke that Obama rejected bombing the complex last month, one had to wonder why? It was reported that Obama feared collateral damage despite being assured that the walls of the complex were high enough that no civilians would be killed. Instead he risked losing Americans in a mano-a-mano raid.”

and I had to laugh. Because after all, 10 ft high walls would clearly stop collateral damage from 32 bombs dropped from many thousands of feet by Stealth bombers - even assuming that a bomb dropped from a couple of miles up in the sky would never miss.

Since that was so silly, I just had to wonder, why would anyone ever believe this person? It almost makes me question the validity of evolution.