re: #181 tradewind

[Link: online.wsj.com…]

That’s what you get from trusting the an opinion page full of weasel words (the Franken evil lawyers “manipulated” stuff and acted “agressively” while the Coleman side behaved all honorably and shit).

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Franken. Why are they wrong in your opinion? If you disagree with them, then you’re of the opinion that those absentee in question ballots should have been rejected. Why?