re: #205 Mike Lamb

My position was that 1. the sufficient evidence is there; 2. the actions of the FPD or lack thereof did not make the evidence insufficient. It could be that things are as klys has described them, which would render all evidence insufficient (for the lack of, say, a video of the incident), but, again, regardless of the FDP actions. Which does not deny the fact that FDP tried to sabotage the case.

I don’t see the relevance of some of the items you describe, but in any case your list is circumstantial, and what is relevant in it, only serves as support for the eye-witness testimony.