re: #7 Charles

These cases are horrible, but if it keeps happening, maybe people will eventually stop denying that maybe there was something to that DHS report after all.

And what of us GWOT veterans who have polar views to the Obama administration who have these following concerns?

1) Immediately changing the conduction of the 10-year national census from the Commerce Department to the executive branch, with ACORN likely to play a roll in cooking the books to solidify power for the current party long after the census is complete.

2) Previous admiration for Marxist professors during his college years. Admiration of anything Marxist I’m afraid is a tacit approval of the entire repression of the human spirit during the great Communist experiment, which is still being unsuccessfully conducted. While some people truly believed that Marxism would bring about a better situation for the human condition, it must be noted that their actions helped perpetrate a system that led to human suffering on a scale that not even the Nazis could approach. At some point one needs to come to terms with the evil of a system that he or she may have been ignorantly faithful to, and that time has long past.

3) Obama’s investigated relationship with William Ayers. You want to talk about domestic terrorists? Let’s talk about a guy who led a group of animals to go on a murdering spree in the name of violent overthrow of the U.S. Government. Bill Ayers now likes to chat it up with reporters in his affluent Hyde park Starbuck’s and place his arm around Bernardine Dohrn and show gullible reporters (not unlike Congressional Black Caucus members) how nice he is. Yeah… Che was an aspiring doctor and Hitler loved children. While political dissidents continue, to this day, to disappear from the streets of Havanna and Caracas, our president undermines our staunch allies like Columbia and cozies to our theatrically appealing enemies. Any sane American with concern of the character and fidelity of the office of the president has to ask why a man would hold a guy like Ayers in such high regard.

4) No law enforcement agency, ever, has been held criminally or civilly liable for failing to protect the well-being of a citizen under assault. If the dispatcher makes a mistake, the police cruiser breaks down, etc etc etc ad nauseum, the department and its officers will not be held liable for a private citizen’s safety when they couldn’t respond quickly enough. Some states forcibly forbid one from carrying a weapon in certain areas, but then take no responsibility for failing to protect the disarmed when a madman violates this statute (insert random school shooting here). Given this, and the fact that every state in our union protects by law one’s ability to defend oneself by deadly force if necessary, it seems rather illogical to protect one’s right to self defense while stifling one’s right to the means of self defense… and yet our president has appointed an attorney general who is attempting to subvert the 2nd Amendment via international treaty, constitution of the land be damned.

5) While we’re on the subject of guns, let’s talk about the Militia, and your and LGF’s contributors tendency in general to view pro-militia folks as crazy right-wing radicals. While I do agree that a good deal of militias have gun-toting nuts in them, keep in mind that the Latin-literate Founders specifically referred to a Militia, and not an organized military force— volgus militum. Surely the Founders knew that in order to provide for the security of a Free State, one must consider the status of Freedom within the State. Is it really so radical to believe in the right of the people to maintain the ability to form a militia? I just had a cop in my hometown get busted for falsifying an attack. How many cops in NYC or DC have connections to the Mob? Do you place more trust in maintaining your safety in the government, or in yourself?